Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dirty Film to DVD

   
Author Topic: Dirty Film to DVD
Steven Pickles
Film Handler

Posts: 81
From: Gainesville, FL, USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 11-29-2001 12:56 AM      Profile for Steven Pickles   Email Steven Pickles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why is it that when a company releases a DVD of one of their titles that the picture is sometimes dirty? Not too noticibly dirty but a speck here and there... as if the film they transferred from was not clean. Why wouldn't the production company use a completely new film and if necessary take out the dirt using a computer before mass producing the final product? This especially affects some of the older titles (which I can understand to some degree) but also has been noticable to me on some new ones too. Anyone have any ideas?

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Duvall
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 500
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-29-2001 04:41 AM      Profile for Christopher Duvall   Email Christopher Duvall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Laziness...'nuff said. It is like some of the lame ass projectionists in the field. Enough to make you weep...



 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-29-2001 07:12 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You would expect them to ultrasonically clean a print immediately before telecine, in which case (assuming the print wasn't beyond hope before it got cleaned), assuming the telecine was done properly, you shouldn't see any dirt.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-29-2001 09:02 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although prints are sometimes used to make the masters for video release, most today are made from a pre-print element, which offer much higher image quality. Sometimes an existing element is used, which may have some wear-and-tear from previous trips through printers or telecines. In most cases, digital "dust-busting" is used for cleaning up artifacts that were not removed by normal cleaning methods. But as with anything today, it's a cost/benefit judgement as to how much is done to make a perfect master.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Peter Eaves
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Burbank, California, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-29-2001 10:44 AM      Profile for Peter Eaves   Email Peter Eaves   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Typically, the major assett holders go to great pains to make the best possible element for transfer from original elements. Original negatives are often painstakingly cleaned frame by frame to remove dirt. But since many of these titles are older, much of the dirt may have been embedded over the years. Scratches and digs are identified and every effort is made to find replacement shots from other pre-print elements. Alas, in some cases there is nothing that can be done photochemically to eliminate some problems and the solution lies in the digital (and expensive) world. As John Pytlak has said, it often comes down to a cost factor.

If you were able to see the condition of many negatives before any of this work is done, you would be amazement at the improvements.

------------------
Peter Eaves
Director of Film Restoration
FotoKem Film and Video
2801 West Alameda Avenue
Burbank, CA 91505
Tel : 818-846-3102
Fax : 818-557-0385
E-mail : peaves@fotokem.com

 |  IP: Logged

Phil Hill
I love my cootie bug

Posts: 7595
From: Hollywood, CA USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 11-29-2001 04:28 PM      Profile for Phil Hill   Email Phil Hill       Edit/Delete Post 
I understand the dust/scratches/etc., but what bugs the HELL outta me is IMAGE WEAVE! What the heck is wrong with these idiots that they cannot correctly set-up the projector or Rank or whatever!? Ya pay good $ for a "Special Edition" and it wanders! NO EXCUSE! GEEEZE!

>>> Phil

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.