Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Who been lucky enough to see Around the World in Eighty Days in widescreen?

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Who been lucky enough to see Around the World in Eighty Days in widescreen? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Who been lucky enough to see Around the World in Eighty Days in widescreen?

Patrick J. McCart
Film Handler

Posts: 24
From: Blue Ridge, GA, USA
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 11-23-2001 11:11 PM

Since the only VHS, Laserdisc, and TV versions of this grossly underrated film are in the grotesque pan & scan format, who has been blessed to see Around the World in Eighty Days on the big screen?

If so, was it the 70mm version or the CinemaScope version?

| IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-24-2001 12:05 AM

I saw a 140 minute version of it in 70mm Dolby Stereo (basically utilizing 4 full mag tracks instead of the original 6) at the Bing Theatre at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art in the early 90's.
This was the (assumably) the same print WB used as a test re-release in Seattle in the early 80's. That version was quickly replaced by an uncut 35mm version for circulation to art houses.

I think the film actually doesnt hold up at all today. Its mostly scenic travelogue with a "look - there's Buster Keaton" type of cameos intersperced with lots of panoramic shots.

| IP: Logged

Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 11-24-2001 02:26 AM

As a younsgster, I saw the original release in Montreal in the full Todd-A-O As I remember, it was one of my first times to Canada, and there was some question of my being able to get into the film because of my young age. Every time I've seen it since then, I've been disappointed by the cropping, color shift, dirt, or some other technical problem.

The film was unabashedly a travelogue meant to showcase the Todd-A-O process. Marty Hart's website does an excellent telling of the process.

| IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 11-24-2001 06:45 AM

I've never seen the film projected, but I'd like to, just to see what everyone thought was so great about it. I think it's nice to look at and I'm sure that in true widescreen the images can be stunning, but I agree with Paul that the whole film was really just an attempt to show off the process. Other than that, it's just another "Oh look...a balloon being lowered by a crane" movie. In one show of the "Movie Magic" series on TDC, they showed how they did that "amazing" shot of the train trestle falling down. It's amazing, all right....amazing that anyone would look at it on a large screen and not think of Lionel! It even looks phony on TV. I guess we've all been spoiled by computerized SE. Still, I'd love to see a good print shown on an enormous screen and enjoy the beautiful soundtrack. For a few hours I might be able to go back to a special time and a simpler existence while being bathed in color, spectacle and sound. They say you can never go back, but you can for a while ... it's one bit of magic that movies can perform.

| IP: Logged

Dennis Atkinson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 129
From: Birch Run Michigan
Registered: Feb 2000

posted 11-24-2001 07:31 AM

I have the trailer, IB scope. Even it doesn't hold up well.
I also hate travelouges.

Dennis

| IP: Logged

Stefan Scholz
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 223
From: Schoenberg, Germany
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 11-24-2001 07:53 AM

I have a Todd Ao print, and I think it still looks stunning, beside the somewhat faded color, which is correctable and viewable. But only if screened on a giant screen, it does look old fashioned on AV's or "normal" theatre screens.
We have screened on our 60 ft screen, and it was even more a treat to see the railway sequence on the 90+ ft screen in another large Roadshow theatre.
It is still one of my most favorite films.

| IP: Logged

Jeff Stricker
Master Film Handler

Posts: 481
From: Calumet, Mi USA
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-24-2001 10:48 AM

I saw it in 35mm when it was making the circuits of the local theaters
after it's big downtown engagement. As I remember I was completely "underwhelmed" and I've had no desire to see it since on the TV screen or a big screen for that matter.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 11-26-2001 12:33 PM

The 70mm and 35mm prints are actually from different negatives, since the 70mm prints used the original Todd-AO 30fps, and the 35mm prints ran at 24fps:
http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/wingto6.htm says:

"Rather than film two significantly different versions, as was necessary in Oklahoma!, Todd's director of photography, Lionel Linden, A.S.C., shot both versions in 65mm. In some cases he used two identical Todd-AO cameras and lenses side by side, one running at 30fps for the 70mm version, and the other running at 24fps for the 35mm reduction print, in other cases the same camera was used by changing the camera speed, and in some cases, the material photographed by a single camera was used in both versions, though this could not be done with dialog sequences."
http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/80daysformats.htm

BTW, I saw a 70mm print when I was only 10 years old during the original roadshow engagement. Don't judge the movie by what you now see on video --- it was made to showcase the 70mm Todd-AO process and should be appreciated and treasured for how it looks and sounds on a big screen.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Howard Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 87
From: Felpham , West Sussex, UK
Registered: Jun 99

posted 11-26-2001 01:56 PM

I showed it in 1968 at the Regent cinema in Brighton, where I was on loan because the Odeon where I normally worked was having alterations. I remember the noise as it went through the DP70 at 30 fps!! There wasn't much time between the changeovers because of the speed. As the management still wanted the adverts and trailers shown the chief had to change one of the projectors from 24fps to 30 fps as well as changing from 70 to 35mm as soon as we were on reel 1 of "80 Days" The quality I can still remember was superb.

| IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 11-26-2001 08:49 PM

The 70mm version of the film I saw was projected at 24fps (per the notes at the museum). This was the WB re-release (shortened) version) and I suspect it may have been blown up from the 35mm reduction of the 70mm 24p version( designed for the Cinestage release).

| IP: Logged

Thomas Hauerslev
Master Film Handler

Posts: 451
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 11-27-2001 04:20 AM

I think the film is spectacular and very entertaining in Todd-AO. The 1956 reviews were very enthusiastic to say the least. It even won a hand full of OSCARS (9 noms and 5 wins), including one for best music, which IS delightful.

The film was shown in Todd-AO at the Wide Screen Weekend in Bradford (England) not so many years ago, and two years ago in the Savoy cinema in Hamburg (That's in Germany folks).

Liz Taylor sold the rights to WB not too many years ago. There have been conflicting information about the condition of the negatives. Some sources says it's beyond restoration and others claims the opposite. It would be a shame if this film is lost. Does anyone know some fact about the state of the 65mm negatives and sound?

Here's a link to a 5-part article about when "Hollywood came to American Optical". From that page I have several links to the facinating story about Todd-AO.

I took this picture in Oslo in 1995, when Jan Olsen and Torkell Sætervadet were so kind to show it at the Colosseum.

You might also want to read about the Cinestage version of "80 Days".

I've got some frames from a 70mm trailer for "80 Days" which is printed in something like 1,66:1. I wonder why this was done.

And finally, the premiere dates for "80 Days"

------------------
Cheers, Thomas
..in70mm - The 70mm Newsletter
www.in70mm.com www.dp70.com www.70mm.dk www.hauerslev.com http://hjem.get2net.dk/in70mm

| IP: Logged

John T. Hendrickson, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 889
From: Freehold, NJ, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

posted 11-27-2001 03:43 PM

I remember seeing the film at a very young age at the Paramount Theatre in Asbury Park, NJ. There was a special projection booth built in the back of the louge for the presentation. I seem to recall at the time that when I asked why they didn't use the upstairs booth above the balcony, I was told that the Todd AO presentation needed to be projected on a level with the screen.

Question for John Pytlak- was that true for 70MM and 35MM? I don't know which format they were showing it in. Could it have been 70MM?

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 11-27-2001 03:52 PM

Obviously, the ideal is to have the projectors orthogonal to the screen, to avoid any keystone distortion. This applies to BOTH 35mm and 70mm projection.

A few "rectified" 70mm prints may have been made for theatres that could not reposition their projectors from high above the balcony:
http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/wingto4.htm

| IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 11-27-2001 08:55 PM

80 Days was a wonderful film--yes, I do love Verne--and those old travelouge films that some of you have put down.

In any case, being a car buff, I rented Chitty Chitty Bang Bang the other day. According to the credits, it too was an 70mm Ultrapanavision Todd AO film.

Unfortunately, despite the advent of letterboxing, distributors/studios still release videos/dvd's without using this technology--which really ruins the presentation! Such as the case with Chitty Chitty Bang Bang! The opening and closing titles of Chitty are letterboxed, but not the feature itself--so only about 1/3 of the image is seen! !

| IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99

posted 11-27-2001 11:51 PM

I believe chitty chitty was super panavision

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.