Is this like 'The General' (the John Boorman thiller, not the Buster Keaton film) - a case of a b/w production being printed onto colour release print stock without the labs taking care to process it properly? There must have been a serious quality control blunder somewhere for each reel to be so different from the last - like all the reel 1s being developed with the chemical mix slightly wrong or at the wrong temperature, then likewise for the reel 2s only slightly different.

If so, is it not possible for proper b/w release print stock to be used for b/w films? Admittedly the number of new b/w films being made is very small and probably not enough for manufacturing a special batch to be economic. Perhaps this problem could be solved by deep-freezing a large amount of raw stock and then thawing it out as needed? After all the silver emulsion is very stable and shrinkage is not a major problem with polyester base.

I can't remeber where I heard it, but it was something to do with the finer grain of colour stock.

Can anybody confirm this, one way or another?

It was shot on Kodak VISION 320T Color Negative Film. The article says they decided to print the film on EASTMAN High Contrast Panchromatic Film 5369, which is NOT normally used as a print film, but rather as an intermediate film for special effects:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/lab/5369.shtml#base

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

Thanks for the links John.

 |  IP: Logged