Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Changeover cue dots. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Changeover cue dots.
Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-16-2001 05:04 PM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This week I am showing 2nd run MGMs (Icon Distribution) “Heartbreakers”, a good anamorphic Spanish print from Madrid Film Lab. On screening I thought that the copy had come from a changeover house as the cues were punch hole mutilated with the motor dot on the left hand side and the c/o dot on the right hand side, some reels were both sides of the screen. These were all Lab negative originated in the print, which surely must be considered mutilation and distracting, and not a good example of John P. ‘Film Done Right’. Are cue dots really necessary now ? or should I think that only projectionists notice them anyway.

I was very impressed with the UK release copies of “Cats & Dogs” which were brilliant rock steady, Italian Technicolor prints, even better still with no changeover cue dots.

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-16-2001 06:37 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are still theatres running changeovers, so there still is a need for the dots.

I also like them when a reel fades out and there is not a clearly marked place for me to cut.
I can just count over 24 frames and cut.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-16-2001 09:12 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are probably more changeover houses world wide than platter houses on a global level still so the cue dots from the lab are far better than having a co house mark there own

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 09-16-2001 11:28 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that they're still necessary. It's a good test of how well a house manages its film during the building phase. Too much dirt & scratches around the "dotted" scenes means bad building habits have found their way into the booth, and it's also a good test of whether splice is interrupting the scene's audio.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-17-2001 02:17 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I like the change-over cues. When I am sitting in an auditorium proofing a movie that is looking for a place to happen, I use those cues to determine how much more time I have to spend in agony waiting for the end to come.

A couple of years ago, a teen-age friend of mine treated me to a movie "The Matrix". Of course, I didn't want to be rude, so I just sat there counting the reels using the cue sets as a reference. He never knew the difference.

The first five reels really were a drag......but when reel 6 hit, that movie finally started kicking butt.

Funny - I noticed the cues at the end of the sixth reel. I was then hoping it was an 8 reeler...

So, it backfired on me, and I broke down and purchased the DVD.


 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 09-17-2001 02:34 AM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Absolutely, there a LOT of change over houses still around. Also when you are working with 'art house' material, which could be almost any aspect ratio, sometimes the cue dots can be a useful guide to the correct ratio to screen it in (assumign the lab has put them in the right place!) Not a method I like, but if you've no other information to go on, at least it's a start.

I've just completed what is certainly my smallest change over installation. the booth is 12' wide, 8 ' deep and 6' high. In there I have two Centurys with Super Lume-X. 2 T&R Rectifiers, a shoulder height sound rack, a Rigby horizontal motor rewind table and an air conditioner. We had to have holes cut into the ceilign to allow 6'000 foot spools to be run, the holes were then boxed over above, and had to be carefully positioned to allow for the steelwork of the building roof. I'll take some pictures soon.

 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 09-17-2001 05:07 AM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like the problem I had installing my basement booth. I had to mount the 6,000' arms suspended from the joists upside down just ahead of the projectors to fit both them and the film cleaners in. Don't lean over while the film is running, though. You'll get a haircut!

 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-17-2001 06:54 AM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually I do miss doing and seeing changeovers. I was quite contented running years ago with 6,000’ spools, and got a great kick out of the Cinemation doing a most perfect changeover! and I did need the cue dots to position the pulses (36 frames in advance). It was only until I was offered a double-sided Westrex Tower with 6 spools, a ½” spindle rewinder & 6k plate at a bargain price of £600.

Until the copy this week changeover cues unless mutilated, have never been a problem to me, and I do see the need for them for the many remaining changeover houses.

Pete, Your latest project must be interesting, I remember seeing a picture where there was insufficient ceiling room, so the 6,000’ spools were mounted side-on from the front of the projection box wall.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-17-2001 07:19 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Gordon that it is much better to have the changeover cues printed-in by the lab, than hand-scribed by the theatre. And as long as there are theatres that use changeovers, all prints should have the cues.

If the theatre needs to add special cues (e.g. curtain or lighting cues), they should be unobtrusive, and REMOVED before sending the print on to the next theatre. Likewise, be sure to remove all foil cues used for automation.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 09-17-2001 08:45 AM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dam straight that was a bargain Bernard!

I once bought a package like that for £50, unfortunately we couldn't get the complete tower out of the building, so we took the motors, control panel etc and left the carcas. Even at that it was still a bargain getting all those spare bits.

I used to put change over cues on with chinagraph, which of course is easily removed. Tabs etc cues I used little white adhesive dots, again easily removed, and with automation, the foil stickers come off easily too.

This little booth I've built is a cracker! We were toying with hanging the spools from the ceiling, but they'd have had to go behind the lamphouse, which wouldn't have worked as the the booth isn't deep enough to allow that. It looks odd as it is, but it works very well indeed.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-17-2001 08:54 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Keep the cue marks. Hand-scribed cues are ugly and usually not spaced correctly. At least the lab cues are usually standardized and unobtrusive. The motion-picture industry does extend beyond first-run gigaplexes and there are plenty of theatres that are still doing changeovers.

Even with platters or 6000' reels, cue marks are handy when breaking down a print, as they can be used to distinguish between reel changes and repair splices.

There's really no reason at this point to get rid of cue marks and there are plenty of reasons to keep them. If they were horribly obtrusive or if the general public noticed them, I would feel differently.

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 09-18-2001 06:37 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think cue dots are horribly obtrusive- they always take me out of the movie. If I already know how many reels the movie is, I can't help counting them either.

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 09-18-2001 08:45 AM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I usually loose count. I use the marks at home for my carbon arc booth. just when you get into the movie, the screen starts to turn purple.

Oh well

Josh


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-18-2001 11:28 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Josh, that used to happen to me in my carbon-arc days of the late '70s. My boss defined it as the "projectionist leaning out the window" problem (and in the summer, he was usually right...that booth was HOT!).

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 09-18-2001 01:06 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, Josh, a projectionist is not supposed to watch his own movies. The "Projectionist Leaning Out The Window" Syndrome Mike cited was one of the biggest fallbacks of those who ran the carbon arc booths.

In fact, I knew of one projectionist that fell out the window. The booth was very hot, so the projectionist only had part of his underwear on when he fell out the booth window. Trouble is, he could not get back into the booth because the door was locked. Embarrassingly, he had to walk down through the auditorum and into the lobby to get the keys to unlock his booth door.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.