Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » John Pytlak: Kodak discovery on VS?

   
Author Topic: John Pytlak: Kodak discovery on VS?
Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-28-2001 08:05 AM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In a current thread on 16mmfilms.com a fellow quoted an article in the Australian Amateur Cine Society journal from 1994 in which Kodak supposedly was experimenting successfully with zeolite, a form of sodium aluminosilicate, packaged in semi-permiable poly wraps, to halt / arrest vinegar syndrom. It went on to say that the Rochester labs were experimenting with 10 old films including an original "Broadway Melody of 1936" negative. Is there any truth to this, or was this perhaps research which resulted in the molecular sieves? Appreciate any info.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-28-2001 01:14 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kodak's patented "Molecular Sieves" adsorb the moisture and acids that are associated with "vinegar syndrome", greatly reducing the rate of degradation. I presented the technical paper to the SMPTE on November 2, 1993. There is lots of information on the Kodak and FPC website:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/molecular.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/hse/mole.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/vinegar.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/hse/safeHandle.shtml
http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/mpa_prod.html
http://www.fpcfilm.com/US/en/motion/FPC/fpc/mole.html

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-30-2001 06:23 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The original 'Broadway Melody of 1936' negative would almost certainly have been nitrate, which is not affected by vinegar syndrome (because the cellulose is dissolved in nitric, rather than acetic acid). Unless the surviving element is a diacetate intermediate, I can't see how any treatment designed to address vinegar syndrome would help it.

Fine-grain interpositives, which were contact printed onto acetate butyrate or acetate propionate stock direct from the camera negative, were sometimes made as so-called 'insurance prints' due to the reduced risk from fire. Some insurance companies insisted that these be struck and stored in a security vault as a condition of underwriting a production. Acetate (safety) film was not used on any significant scale by the movie industry until the launch of 'high-acetyl' cellulose triacetate in 1948 because it was far more brittle, fragile and prone to short-term shrinkage than nitrate was. However, it was OK for just printing once or twice, hence its use for insurance safety copies. In fact, the term 'insurance PRINT' is quite misleading, because they are in fact many generations closer to the original negative than any release print would be.

Quite a few films have been saved that way. For example, when a nitrate vault burnt down at a small lab in South London specialising in archival work in 1992, the camera negatives of several well-known Ealing comedies, which were being printed up for a national re-release, were lost. New preservation masters were made from the insurance prints, which the National Film and Television Archive had kept in a separate location.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-30-2001 09:23 AM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good point, Leo. I was aware that acetic acid was an "acetate" issue and did not apply to nitrate, so the mention of "Broadway Melody" did ring a bell in my head, but I did not know about the insurance negs. My question was really whether this 1994 article referred to research leading up to the molecular sieves, or whether there was some other "wonder cure" that Kodak was playing with. From John's response I gather it's the sieves, which in my case aren't too practical for some 300 odd features stored on open shelves!

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-30-2001 12:56 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Leo,
I'm curious what Ealing negatives were lost in the fire. Thats pretty sad but it is dangerous stuff and it has happened before.
Also, does anyone know who distributes the Ealing films here in the States?
Mark @ GTS

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-31-2001 02:50 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The o-negs of 'Whisky Galore' and 'Kind Hearts and Coronets' went up in the Hendersons fire. There's a mention of it in Penelope Houston's book on film archives, 'Keepers of the Frame' (London, BFI, 1984).

The worldwide rights to all the Ealing output from when Gaumont-British sold the studio in 1938 to when the BBC bought it in 1956 are now owned by Canal Plus, a French broadcaster. Someone told me that they do have a rep in New York but I couldn't give you any contact info - sorry. Sadly they haven't put any money into providing decent new prints recently and so apart from the occasional screening of National Film Archive prints in London, the only prints you get to see here are worn-out 1970s copies.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 08-31-2001 08:43 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's too bad about Whisky Galore; it's one of my fav's. There's just so much film to save(and store), sometimes I'm surprised as much has survived.

 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-02-2001 04:29 PM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many years ago I did a showing of Ben Travers “Rookery Nook” which was thought to be forever lost as the original negatives were destroyed in a vault flood. A nitrate copy was found in the basement of a derelict cinema and the film was completely restored by the BFI.

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-04-2001 02:26 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Leo said: "The original 'Broadway Melody of 1936' negative would almost certainly have been nitrate, which is not affected by vinegar syndrome (because the cellulose is dissolved in nitric, rather than acetic acid). Unless the surviving element is a diacetate intermediate, I can't see how any treatment designed to address vinegar syndrome would help it."

Although cellulose nitrate and cellulose triacetate are different polymers, the hydrolysis reaction that causes degradation of the base is similar, releasing acid vapors and moisture. In a sealed container, Molecular Sieves adsorb the moisture and acids released, and so will slow the degradation of either type of film:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/molecular.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/vinegar.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/hse/safeHandle.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/hse/mole.shtml

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.