Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Pearl Harbor Dye-transfer problems?

   
Author Topic: Pearl Harbor Dye-transfer problems?
Jeff Joseph
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Palmdale, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 06-24-2001 06:35 PM      Profile for Jeff Joseph   Author's Homepage   Email Jeff Joseph   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We saw "Pearl Harbor" in dye-transfer Technicolor yesterday (Saturday). Went to the GCC Sherman Oaks (in Los Angeles). On the can was print number "B-Dye 008". The print does NOT have green cue marks, as it was from a dupe negative, not the camera negative. Stunning color, and wonderful, deep, rich blacks.

The gate was filthy. I discussed it with the projectionist, who said the print, like "Toy Story II" before it, was having "shedding" problems, resulting in dirt in the gate and focus problems. I had been told by Technicolor that this problem had been solved. Has anyone else had this problem with this title?

Jeff Joseph
SabuCat Productions
http://www.sabucat.com http://www.35mmforum.com

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-24-2001 07:01 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, and there was all this pink "snow" building up inside the projector that smelled like "dead fish", right?

The usual cause of this is that the projector is "scuffing" the film. It can happen in several places, like pad rollers, but the usual cause (in my experience) is that the gate is too tight.

You'll probably find out that the projector in question has always seemed to "run dirty". It's just that IB-Tech prints, being made in a totally different way, are a lot more prone to shedding if the projector is maladjusted like that.
I once had a print of GWTW that shed like crazy. I'm telling you it looked like a snowstorm! A quick adjustment of the gate solved the problem.... mostly. You see, once a print has been scuffed up like that, it's likely to ALWAYS run dirty. It'll do it even if you move the print to another projector. Thus, the next question you should have asked them is whether this print has been exhibinting this behavior for a while or whether it's just starting. The idea is to find out which projector is committing the offence.

The only possible solution would be a nice coating of FilmGuard and lots and lots of run-throughs with the film cleaner. (Which is what you DO when you use FG.) I'd also recommend a through, take-apart cleaning of the projector(s) with a vacuum cleaner as well. (Like I said, that junk that comes off the film really STINKS!)


----------------------------------------------


Pink, dead fish snowstorm.
Technicolor I.B. print.
Fix the projector!

-Projectionist's Haiku


 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-25-2001 02:45 AM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah, I'm glad someone else describes it as "dead fish", because I was beginning to wonder if it was just me. Or if my memory was failing; the only modern dye-transfer prints I've run were two "13th Warriors" a couple years ago. They did stink but they didn't really shed, just left behind a waxy residue. Does anyone know the cause of the smell and whether it's only present when a dye-transfer print sheds?

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-25-2001 11:22 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know what the reason for the smell is, either but when you open the cans somethimes you can smell it too. Must be something about the formulation of the emulsion because it's specially made to absorb the dye.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-25-2001 12:19 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rotting fish smell?
http://myweb.veriomail.com/vpweb/news_archives/1997/wrd97001.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-25-2001 12:31 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok, then, so maybe I should go take a shower?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.