Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Steadiness of dye transfer prints

   
Author Topic: Steadiness of dye transfer prints
Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-11-2001 03:49 AM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some idle thoughts and reasoning:

(1) The dye transfer image is created through three separate printing passes of the various dye elements, CMY.

(2) For a print to be of acceptable quality, these elements must be aligned exactly to each other (within 0.0002 inch, according to http://www.technicolor.com/aboutus/about-innovations.html). Otherwise, fringing and fuzziness will result.

(3) The elements will be aligned to each other if they are properly registered on the film. This is accomplished (I think) with a pin-belt system; therefore the image is registered relative to the perforations of the film. (Obviously...)

(4) Therefore, in an acceptable print, since all three color elements are precisely aligned to each other, they must also be precisely registered to the perforations. And since each color element is steady, the overall image must also be very steady.

In other words, theoretically, a good dye transfer print should always be steady. As steady as the source material, anyway. Has anyone noticed this? Any corrections to my reasoning?


 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 06-11-2001 09:22 AM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In theory, unless yor movement is a POS

Josh


 |  IP: Logged

John Schulien
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 206
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-12-2001 05:37 PM      Profile for John Schulien   Email John Schulien   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've thought about this also. It's a good example of the difference between accuracy and precision. Accuracy has to do with measurement against a standard, while precision has to do with reproducability. A measurement or process can be accurate, but not precise, or vice versa.

The new IB printing machines use a short race-track shaped pinbelt that aligns the matrix with the receiver film, and presses them together. The machine then peels off the the two-film "sandwich" and passes it through a long "transfer box" which keeps the matrix in contact with the receiver film long enough for the dye to transfer.

I'm speculating that in order to get the best possible registration:

1) All three colors must be printed using the same machine, and

2) The pin-belt must be aligned to the same sprocket before each color is transferred.

Why? Imagine a tiny defect in the pin-belt that causes a slight misalignment of the matrix with the receiver. If the pin-belt were randomly aligned for each color, or the different colors were printed on different machines, then each time that defect came around on the pin-belt, it would create an error that would only affect one color, and produce fringing.

However, if the pin-belt were aligned to the same pin for each color, that same defect would be duplicated for each color, and there would be no fringing.

So it might be entirely possible to have an IB print with perfect color registration, but overall picture weave. For what it's worth, I've never seen anything like that, but still, I wonder if IB printing procedures call for the alignment of the pin-belt to the same sprocket, or even call for the same machine for all three transfers.

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-12-2001 07:32 PM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah, good points. I'd simply assumed that the dye transfer print was a product of randomly made passes through the printer, in which case I think my original arguments would hold-- the process would have to be both accurate (perfect color element alignment) and precise (perfect overall image registration).

But your arguments certainly make sense. It sounds like the number of registration pins involved in the belt number in the hundreds, and it would be very difficult or expensive to maintain them all to ensure the same precise tolerances. Making sure each sprocket hole ends up with the same pin in the same printer on each pass sounds like a good, practical idea. Although, if the lab can do that, you'd think they could also get lab splices in frame...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.