Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Digital Technology for 3D??

   
Author Topic: Digital Technology for 3D??
Mike Bianchi
Film Handler

Posts: 40
From: Independence, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-08-2001 10:52 PM      Profile for Mike Bianchi   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Bianchi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to sound like I favor digital presentation over film (because I certainly do NOT), but I also love 3D and with the help of Tim Reed and the Condon family at Stereovision we've very successfully shown 3D films. Now I'm wondering if digital technology might be tapped for 3D projection.

I'm hoping some of you true tech guys here would have some insight on a hair-brained scheme of mine. It may be off the wall, but such musings are often the nexus of technological advances. So what the heck?

So here's my cockamamie scheme...
Connect a digital source (DVD player?) to a projection source (Proxima type projector?) in conjuntion with a silver screen of course. The DVD would contain both the side-by-side or over/under images of a 3D film. Then the projector would be outfitted with a polarized mirror box.

Fire it up and set the convergence and...

... 3D, right?

There is probably some technological hurdle but this epiphany hit me the other day and I finally drew up the cajones to ask.

And the peanut gallery says...


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-08-2001 11:09 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The thing I HATE about 3D is that you always must wear some sort of eyewear. Annoying. I used to draw 3D comic strips by hand, and the effect was very convincing. But I noticed the readers would bitch about having to wear the glasses. I decided that the effect was not worth it.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-09-2001 12:14 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
My customers are disappointed when they don't get to wear the cool glasses!

I don't see why you couldn't do polarized 3D video projection ... as long as it was "filmed" in 3D.

You'd get a better result using two separate projectors (left eye; right eye) so that you get a better resolution and brightness. Don't forget the silver screen!

How would the video "lines" affect the polarization? Would you have to use 45-degree polarizers?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-09-2001 01:44 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Adam, your post seems to insinuate that you are showing 3D without glasses. How could you do 3D without glasses (other than using holograms)? How will you tell the left image to go only into the left eye and vice-versa? There is nothing in the eyeball that says "I am the right eyeball, I will not allow certain images to pass that the left eyeball would."


 |  IP: Logged

Mike Bianchi
Film Handler

Posts: 40
From: Independence, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 06-09-2001 02:29 AM      Profile for Mike Bianchi   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Bianchi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only problem with 2 projectors would by synchronization. That might be a solution if you wanted a large picture size, but I'm thinking more along the lines of home use or small auditorium.

I don't mind the glasses - I have a nice pair with regular hard plastic lenses that are just like regular glasses.

The resolution lines vs. the lines of polarization are indeed one of those technical issues I hadn't thought of...

Keep 'em coming...

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-09-2001 11:08 AM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
We have special shows where we attach electrodes to the customers heads that are, in turn, attached to the shutter of the 3D projector. The electrical pulses cause the eyelids to open and close 48 times a second with the appropriate image on the screen.

Really, though, I was talking about 2D shows.

2-projector synchronization could be done with the DVD timecode. Now, coming up with a way to modify the DVD players with a "timecode in" like on a DAT player ...

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-09-2001 11:24 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We did a 3d presentation with to JVC Huges machine using timecode lock on the high8 tapes

 |  IP: Logged

Jerry Chase
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1068
From: Margate, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-09-2001 11:30 AM      Profile for Jerry Chase   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two projector digital 3-D on movie size screens has already been done. Millenium Theatre in Kissimme Fl, just down from Disney in the building that used to house "American Gladiators" did this back in 1998. They used two Barcos with a proprietary software program that turned 2-D high end video tapes into 3-D. This was actually the first place I saw true digital cinema using the TI chips. They were showing "Lost in Space" at the time I installed my ticketing software for them. The film worked well with their 3-D video software because of the large amount of panning in the film, which cued the software for depth. The effect was surprisingly good, with a very bright, clear, large picture.

I'm trying to remember if there was an issue with the light coming out of the digital projectors being already polarized in some way. There might hae been or I might e confusing it with something else. Anyway, they had free standing polarizing filters in front of the units, and the throw was probably 150 feet or more.

The "theatre" was never able to make money, there is a long story about environmental impact fees, seating and restaurant business.
It was one of those ephemeral projects that you have to be in the right place at the right time to witness.

LCD shutter glasses are generally preferred for video based 3-D. The interlacing in the NTSC signal has been convenient for that.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-10-2001 06:57 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The pre-show for the 3D IMAX dome ride-film "Race for Atlantis" is done with 3D video. Seemed pretty good on a smallish screen, but the film presentation blew it away. Likewise, the 5-perf 70mm 2-strip 3D for films like "Captain EO" or "Honey I Shrunk the Audience" or the Universal Studios "Terminator 3D" attraction are very impressive. But everything pales when compared to IMAX 3D.

The 3D presentation I was most impressed with was "Echoes of the Sun", done with IMAX "Solido" on a dome --- the 3D images literally surrounded you:
http://www.imax.com/films/distribution/echoes_of_sun.html

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 06-10-2001 07:18 AM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There was a video game marketed quite a number of years ago that made use of field switching, showing one image per field with LCD shutter glasses plugged into the unit. People ended up with too many headaches. Perhaps you remember the system used in the Super Bowl about ten years ago which relies on the fact that your eyes respond differently to various levels of light. You had to wear a pair of glasses in which one lense was clear and the other dark. As long as the picture was being panned, you saw the depth information between the two eyes. Using polarized lenses in front of video projectors wouldn't be affected by the scan lines of the picture raster, since the lines aren't actually polarized...they're just long,thin picture segments. In other words, 3-D TV is nothing new. Shutter glasses, polarized lenses, anaglyph (2-color) 3-d has all been tried with varying degrees of success before. What's needed is a new type of display. The military is currently working with a clear crystal display which utilizes two intersecting ultraviolet laser beams. The crystal only flouresces at the intersection of the beams, so you can do a real three dimensional display (think of radar displays here). It was discovered by a young woman who was working on her graduate thesis. The problem is that the size of the crystal is limited and you only get one color. Of course, TV started that way too.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-10-2001 05:45 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John-

Have you seen the old Sega Master System videogame system that existed in the 80's? It had 3D videogames using LCD shutter goggles. I bet IMAX 3D couldn't touch that!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.