Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Strong 2020 turret R10 resistor q. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Strong 2020 turret R10 resistor q.
Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-22-2001 12:10 AM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gotta question perhaps some of you electronic whizzes out there can answer for me.

Reference: Manuals Section;
Simplex 35 Model PR1060 with TU2020/2030 turret parts (Oct.93)

Manual page 35 (turret controller schematic)

I have been having some luck working on repairing these things lately. While searching the schematic, however, I have to wonder about the purpose of resistor R10.

Basically, it is placed at the output of the bridge D6 and (to my way of thinking) does nothing but dissipate heat.

Further it is only on the output feeding the 5-volt regulator, there is not one on the 12-vot side.

While testing this circuit, on the repair bench, I can see no reason for its existence, other than burning my thumb when I turn the board over to press the buttons on the board .

My son feels that it may be necessary to discharge the capacitors prior to the regulator, after powering down. Not sure if I agree.

Any ideas?


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-22-2001 07:54 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would agree with your son. It's probably there to discharge that large 1000 microfarad filter capacitor (C3) on shutdown. But why isn't there a similar load on C4? Maybe Pat Moore has more insight into the design.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-22-2001 12:17 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it is to load down the 1000uF cap, which reduces the DC ripple into the voltage regulator, thus improving it. I understand that adding a resistor there would usually make the ripple worse, but since it is on the input, the ripple is still above the 5v. The 5v is pulling more amperage, and I'm guessing that after the circuirt was done, they found the ripple too high, and this was a quick fix. There isn't a 100 ohm resistor on the other (12v) supply, because it requires less amperage, and was smooth enough.

Or, maybe they found that there was a race-condition "glich" when powering off, (the turret motor would start to spin just a little, or the solenoid would unlatch, for example) and wanted to kill the 5v quickly.

What I'd like to know is what the code is in that programmable part, so I can figure the turret operation out.


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-22-2001 06:08 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe it is there to load down the transformers secondary so that it probably has a problem with the regulator presenting to little load.
If it is accross the cap for filter reasons it is making the ripple situation worse since the current level that the cap is filtering is higher. Also the regulator would discharge the cap and as such doesn't need aloading resistor

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-22-2001 09:01 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You're probably right about the ripple, Gordon. Although, I still think it may be to prevent race-condition "gliches" when powering off or on.

Either way, I'd bet it was added late in the design stage.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-24-2001 05:12 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok....here is Steve's guess...

R10 is, for sure, a bleed off resistor...it isn't to help with charging the capacitor (it would be in series then) nor can it help with ripple.

I think the answer lies in pin 1 of IC 1...it is labled "Reset". R10 probably forms the "reset" on power off...without R10...there is VERY little stuff to bleed off the 1000uF capacitor (the regulator, oscillator and IC1)...the size of R10 was probably choosen such that it will achieve an active low on a typical power cycle.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-25-2001 09:59 PM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you all for your replies.

Steve may be right on this, although I am beginning to harbour (harbor?) a suspicion that this may have been a cheap and dirty way of preventing spike or unusually high line voltages from exceeding the input parameters of the 7805 regulator by loading down the input.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-26-2001 03:41 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A couple of flaws in that reasoning....

First, if one wanted to "load the input" then the resistor should be on the output of the trasformer, not the diodes....why would you load your diodes (and make them heat up more) without reason. Furthermore, diodes are can fail from spikes as much as anything...often there will be a supressor capacitor across the input of the rectifier to clamp said spike (typically low capacitance but high voltage).

The only logical reason for R10 is bleed off the main filter cap at a fast enough rate. Since I don't see it in the parts listing (ie what is it's wattage) I suspect that it was added after "field testing".

Do you know what the output of the transformer is? The 7805 with proper heatsinking can take a lot. It also doesn't seem to be loaded very heavy.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"


 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-26-2001 08:02 PM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That is sorta my point. The 5V circuit is not loaded much at all, thus the output of the transformer will be somewhat higher than if it were loaded (I did measure the voltage, but forget exactly what it was, but it is the same as the output for the 12V side). I agree with your point about if loading was the reason, it should have been placed directly across the secondary winding.

BTW, the 7805 just sits there in mid-air with no heat-sink. It was the 7805 that I had to change on the first unit I repaired.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-26-2001 09:14 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the value and wattage of R10? I'd like to write that down in my manual, since it's not listed.

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-27-2001 03:17 AM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As I recall it's 1/2 watt, and gets hot.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-27-2001 06:12 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If it gets "burning" hot, consider using a resistor with a higher power rating, if it fits.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-27-2001 10:06 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is a spec sheet for that voltage regulator (I think.) There is no actual listing for a "VR7805" although it seems like a standard part.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2001 12:20 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the VR means Voltage Regulator and the 7805 is a standard from many manufacturers.
It also is about at its maximum input range as they really don't like much above 12volts input

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-28-2001 12:36 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From an engineering standpoint, the concept of putting a loading resistor in circuit is just plain silly (unless it is required for stabilization...some IC amplifiers are designed for low impedance outputs and must be loaded in order to not oscillate themselves to death).

If the goal was to drop the voltage the other safter solutions are many...including series resistance (since the load is known and the regulator gives wide range)...a series zener diode can also drop the voltage well and again current load on the output isn't high so it needn't be huge (heck Strong's igniter circuits work using said zeners to drop the open circuit voltages).

I'm sticking with simple bleed off.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.