Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Help needed determining a scratch origination (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Help needed determining a scratch origination
Cory Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: La Crosse, WI USA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 05-07-2001 12:23 AM      Profile for Cory Johnson   Email Cory Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pro 35 projector with a DTS reader mounted on top. I am 100% sure it is something on the projector itself, so I will leave the platters out of this. What is basically happening is we are getting a faint, vertical scratch(es) on the very right side of the film, (the side opposite of the sound track). Now, the projector has been doing this for as long as I can remember, however, it was never a big issue before because the size of the screen cropped it off so it was not noticeable. However, we got stadium seating and a bigger screen as of late and know the screen is the correct aspect ratio and the scratches are visible. I will try and describe them as best as I can.
- Only seem to appears after a couple of showings, but always "develop" over time.
- Once they are there, they don't really get any worse.
- Appear about a foot from the right hand of the screen on a descent sized screen (50ft ish).
- Are vertical and vary from a single, vertical scratch about 8 inches long to a bunch of smaller vertical scratches lined up very close to each other.
- Are patterned. What I mean is they appear in the same location on each film. Always towards the middle of the frame seems the worse.
- If you look physically at the film, you have to look VERY closely at it and you can see some "buff" marks at the spot of the scratches. Almost like a very light contact with a harsh object.
- I have tried a different film gate and it didn't change the scratch nor its characteristics.
- doesn't cover the entire film evenly, nor the frame evenly. Some reels you can't see the faint scratch, others it is very visible.
I have check every possible thing I can think of for this so any help is appreciate. Our techs don't know what could be causing it because all of the equipment looks good when inspected. Thanks in advance.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 01:06 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Making the bottom loop too big perhaps? Just a guess.


 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 02:00 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I second that guess and I'll raise you a "spitball".

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-07-2001 03:26 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ok here is a posability. two things could be happening first the pad rollers may be set to close to film. that would cause ones close to edge of picture.

Second there is a roller between the intermittent sprocket and the lower feed sprocket of the projector head. check this roller for wear or for that matter go ahead and replace it this damn thing does not like to turn and can wear the roller down causing film the inner part of roller.

 |  IP: Logged

Dustin Mitchell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1865
From: Mondovi, WI, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-07-2001 03:32 AM      Profile for Dustin Mitchell   Email Dustin Mitchell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had a very similar problem (still have occasionaly actually). Check the alignment of the upper and lower magazine rollers, the ones that feed the film to the platter. If these are not lined up perfect, the film can ride up on the edge of one of these rollers and this will cause exactly the kind of damage you are describing.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 04:04 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Cory, I am reading conflicting descriptions in your post. At one point you said that the scratches are only visible now because you got a new screen and the edges are not being masked off like they were before. If this is the case, then all of the scratches should be on the right edge. This is most probably a pad roller scratch. They should be aligned so that the roller spins freely with 2 layers of film in between the closed pad roller and the sprocket, but the roller should not be able to spin with 3 layers of film.

On another part of your post you mentioned "always towards the middle of the frame seems the worse", which seems to directly contradict your earlier statement about the masking and "appear about a foot from the right hand of the screen on a descent sized screen (50ft ish)". Please clarify so we can be of better help.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 04:17 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is my guess that by "middle" he meant on the right side, but towards the center from top to bottom.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 04:23 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Then if Joe read it correctly and the scratch does not extend completely from top to bottom of the projected image, it is either a loop scratch or an aperture scratch.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-07-2001 06:27 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Like the others, I vote for a loop scratch. Check those loop sizes.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-07-2001 01:30 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I KNOW you said that you don't think the platters are not involved, but I MUST know what platters you are using there?

Aaron


 |  IP: Logged

Marc Jones
Film Handler

Posts: 82
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 04:56 PM      Profile for Marc Jones   Email Marc Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have seen some thing simular on the older Potts type platter The film comes off the roller as the film goes onto the rewind platter.

The scratches this would make were from one side and goes to center at a little bit of an angle, and it only take one time.


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-07-2001 05:06 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I am understanding it correctly, the scratches are always in the same place on each frame. It does not move or wander. That basically eliminates the possibility of a roller scratch.

Cory, are you using the same aperature as before, or was a new one cut when the new screen was put in? You say that the scratches were there before the new screen was put in.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 05-07-2001 05:41 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Emusion side scratch? or non-emulsion side scratch?

If it is a non-emulsion scratch, check the runner plate of the trap. It may have been dropped. Take the film trap out, and look for a "polished" surface on the curve that holds the intermittent sprocket shoe. It it is, chances are you found the problem. Very common with the Pro-35.

Just spring it back a little, and you should be ok.

If it is diagonal scratches on the emulsion side, the loops are probably too big and it is hitting the framing shaft, or that stupid roller the film lays on between the intermittent sprocket and hold-back sprocket. Take it off, shaft and all, and 99% of your emulsion scratches will go away.

I have taken all of mine off 15 years ago, and threw them away. The machine will run perfectly fine without them.


 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-07-2001 06:38 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Paul just get rid of that stupid roller between the intermittent sprocket and hold back sprocket. The older style pro 35's did not have these rollers if memory serves me correctly. What the hell they were thinking about when they added it is beyond me.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-07-2001 07:05 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cory,

When you bypass the dts reader (when not needing to use it), does the film rub on the top guide roller of the dts reader? Even lightly touch it?

If it does (even more-so when it only just touches it,) that roller will not move and a 'green' print will see light scratches appear over time. dts readers are sometimes mis-aligned to the film path and use the fact that they are actually running through the reader to get 'on track', but when bypassing, the film is on another trajectory and this will put the right side of the image onto the roller.

That's my take...


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.