Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Soundtrack UP or DOWN?!?!?! (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Soundtrack UP or DOWN?!?!?!
Gordon Hedges III
Jealous of everyone not me

Posts: 212
From: Severn, MD
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-01-2001 02:01 AM      Profile for Gordon Hedges III   Email Gordon Hedges III   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been working with platters for many years and have been trained to thread with the soundtrack down. Recently, I got a (demand?) to place the soundtracks up because it is the company's policy of sorts. Mainly so that the soundtrack does not get damaged when it loads onto the take-up platter. But in my defense, if the film takes up correctly then the film should not scratch at all. Plus, I have also heard that with it down you lessen your risk of static wraps.

I just want to know which way is efficient to maintain a great presentation of the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 02:46 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With polyester film, which is what you are using, you should take up with the soundtrack up on the platter. Even the film wrapped around my head as a blindfold is soundtrack up!

Running the soundtrack edge downward, toward the platter's surface puts the film at many potential risks, including severe horizontal "platter scratches" and emulsion side scratches should the film drag around the brain.  Running soundtrack down can also cause focus problems and erratic payout of the film.



 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 07:23 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What kind of corporate policy is that? Wouldn't it be better to have a corporate policy about "don't damage film" (maybe something like "you break it, you buy it"?) rather than having one that basically says "we know that you will damage the film, but at least this way it will get damaged in a less offensive way"?

To my way of thinking, the only legitimate debate here is emulsion-in versus emulsion-out winding. I'm sure that others (Brad, John P., Steve G., etc.) will have plenty to say about this.

I suppose that the other possible issue is standardization: if one theatre starts doing something "weird" and employees from another theatre have to go there and run the booth someday, things will tend to run better if things tend to work in mostly the same way as they do in other theatres. That would tend to be a very good argument for soundtrack-up orientation, since that seems to be common in most theatres (just like "S-wind" for reel-to-reel booths). Any deviation from this would have some potential for causing problems for employees who were familiar with the "standard" configuration. Whether this is an issue probably depends on the degree of turnover of the employees in a particular theatre. In any case, I do think that every theatre that has any sort of house-specific procedure ought to post a notice to this effect above the booth desk or rewind bench, along with information like the proper placement of automation cues (if using automation), typcial order of trailers, etc.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-01-2001 08:11 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SMPTE Recommended Practice RP 39-1993 has "Specifications for Maintaining an Emulsion-In Orientation on Theatrical Release Prints". This recommended practice was based on work by Paul Preo and Eric Yavitz of Kodak, reported in the June 1965 SMPTE Journal, "Effect of Winding on the Projection Performance of 35mm Motion-Picture Film".

Preo and Yavitz documented a significant improvement in screen image quality when 35mm theatrical release prints were wound, used and stored consistently in an emulsion-in orientation, including minimal focus drift and a much lower tendency toward flutter and in-and-out of focus. BUT, their work was based on the performance characteristics (e.g., curl, core-set) of TRIACETATE base film, using small-hub (2000-foot) reels. Unfortunately, a similar study has not been done for today's POLYESTER print films which have different curl and core-set characteristics, or with platter performance.

That said, many on Film-Tech have noted that POLYESTER prints usually perform better when wound emulsion-out (analog soundtrack up) on a platter. With platters, the effect of winding orientation on focus flutter is much less important. Compared to a core or reel, the hub diameter is much greater, so there is little "core-set". The preferred winding orientation on a platter depends mostly upon the curl of the film, which in turn, depends upon the relative humidity in the projection room. Use the orientation that gives the best winding quality, and the least tendency for "static cling" in your situation. It may vary with the humidity.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 11:03 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll bet that Steve G. has something to add to this thread.
Mark G.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 02:05 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, definitely run the soundtrack up. Many platters cannot get up to speed on startup and severely wrap the film around the brain a couple of times while the speed stabilizes. Do you really want the first 30 seconds of your audience's first impression of your presentation covered in green and yellow scratches? It can and does happen all the time.

Does the film sometimes drag around the brain partway? If it is soundtrack up there is no need to let this worry you, for there isn't enough pressure against the base side to matter. However, if you are running soundtrack down having the emulsion drag around the brain will start making light scratches that are visible after a certain number of runs.

All polyester film comes with a negative curl. Lay a short strip of film emulsion down against the surface of a flat table. Note only the edges touch the table. Now lay the film emulsion up, away from the surface. Note that the edges of the film no longer touch the table, but the center of the film does. This sort of curl will be magnified if the film is stored emulsion in (soundtrack down) and will cause focus issues in some projectors. Winding the film emulsion out will help the film to "flatten out" as it stays wound that way.

Remember that report was made 36 years ago! Polyester film wasn't even a consideration when that little tidbit was written. Polyester film also has the exact opposite curl than acetate film did (in which the study was based on). Keep it "up"!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 04:08 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think its time for all of the SMPTE RP's to be updated for todays standards. I'm sure that there are many that will not have to be changed as they still apply today. But listening to 1965 guidelines is like following the suggestions for a carburetor engine when everything today is fuel-injection. Some things still apply, but others are drastically wrong, just like SMPTE RP 39-1993.

SMPTE is out of touch.


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon Hedges III
Jealous of everyone not me

Posts: 212
From: Severn, MD
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-01-2001 05:57 PM      Profile for Gordon Hedges III   Email Gordon Hedges III   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess that since I have been "emulsion-in" for many years, I would think that it was the only way and the best. I know that I am not an expert film handler, nor an idiot. Just that everything was taught to me by other projectionists in the past. I am beginning to realize how naive I am about some of the things I have been trained to do.

I just wanted to know if there was more to this. I do know that many theatres do have emulsion-out, but were never really given a great description of WHY. Thanks for all your information.

I noticed that others have brought up Steve G. Would that be Guttag? If so, I was also interested to hear what he would say, besides that my projector is running.

Soundtrack-Up, so it will be. But I have always been annoyed with these polyester static problems. I have tried many items from humidifiers to just plain "babysitting". Guttag introduced me to FILM-GUARD (well, the company) and we have not really had the usual brain wraps as before. It could also be that we recently moved from our old location to a newly built theatre.


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-01-2001 06:51 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Platters are the passion of Steve Guttag. So if you have a platter question of any kind, Steve G is definitely the person to ask. I hear Steve is actually designing a platter so that we may finally get rid of all those pesky changeover theaters!

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-02-2001 12:08 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I prefer soundtrack UP for all the reasons people have said here. (Namely that scratch-upon-startup issue.)

Still, I think any good projectionist should take a good, hard look at his setup and decide which way is best. Who knows, you may have some difference in your system that demands the film be run a certain way. No matter what your decision you have to get everybody on the same page as far as threading and running goes. Everybody MUST thread the film exactly the same way. Loop-for-loop... Twist-for-twist... carbon copies!

I have been to so many places where the people all thread different ways and that has caused me no end of grief! It is nigh-on impossible to fix things when a film problem (like a wrap) occurs because you have to decode some kid's threading pattern before you try to fix it. Furthermore, when somebody calls me and asks about some problem (the film getting scratched, for instance) I have to spend 1/2 hour questioning people about the way they thread before I can even begin to help them. The first thing I usually end up asking is, "Who's in the booth tonight."

Now multiply this by about 10 people per site who are threading projectors. Multiply that by as many as 20 sites (that I might be called to) and you can see what kind of nightmare I can be faced with.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-02-2001 01:43 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What about those platters that take up with a clockwise rotation? Do any of those still exist? What the hell is the deal with those types of platters anyway? Do the manufacturers also make projectors that run backwards (film comes in from the bottom) but everything is reversed so it looks fine onscreen?


 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 05-02-2001 08:49 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
those pieces of crap AW-2 platters with the formica surfaces you had to run the soundtrack up if not and that takeup roller gets out of alighnment the soundtrack is scratched. Those platters could be a constant pain because the edge of the film had to ride on the edge of the platter to get a smooth take-up.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-02-2001 09:16 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad said:

"All polyester film comes with a negative curl. Lay a short strip of film emulsion down against the surface of a flat table. Note only the edges touch the table. Now lay the film emulsion up, away from the surface. Note that the edges of the film no longer touch the table, but the center of the film does."

Not always the case. Curl depends mostly upon the relative humidity tha film is equilibrated to. Film emulsion is mostly gelatin, which expands as it absorbs moisture, and contract as it dries out. Polyester film base is very stable as the humidity changes, so when the humidity changes, the film's curl will change as the emulsion shrinks or expands relative to the base.

Processed print film is designed to lie flat between 50 and 60 percent relative humidity. As the humidity gets below 50 percent RH, the emulsion shrinks more than the base, causing the film to curl inward toward the emulsion. This is termed "POSITIVE" curl, not negative as Brad described. In really damp conditions, the gelatin emulsion may absorb enough moisture to expand and cause the film to curl toward the base side -- this is termed "NEGATIVE" curl:
Definition of Curl
Description of Curl

Under very dry or very moist conditions, there may be enough positive or negative curl to cause winding difficulties (e.g., spoking, roll taking the form of a polygon rather than a circle). Use the winding orientation that give the best winding quality and least tendency to pull in with "static cling":
Platter Patter article

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-02-2001 09:23 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe said "I think its time for all of the SMPTE RP's to be updated for todays standards. I'm sure that there are many that will not have to be changed as they still apply today... Some things still apply, but others are drastically wrong, just like SMPTE RP 39-1993. SMPTE is out of touch."

The SMPTE reviews and revises standards and recommended practices on a five-year schedule. It's likely the last review of RP39 was done before there was sufficient experience with polyester prints to make a change. It still does apply to triacetate prints.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-02-2001 09:51 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess one thing has been forgotten in that the employer has a right to set the standards for policies that they want there theatres to follow.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.