Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Green Bands

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Green Bands - SMPTE Standards (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Author

Topic: Green Bands - SMPTE Standards

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-22-2001 03:49 PM

John P. - Is there any work on standardizing the layout of a trailer?

Most theatres, I think, remove the green band and we have had discussions regarding this.

Why ask this?
1. Because sound sometimes starts in the green band and gets cut off.
2. None or very few black frames between end of green band and start of trailer.
3. None or very few black frames between end of trailer and end of physical medium.
4. Green band fades resulting in possible projection of 1 or 2 frames of green band before trailer.

I personally like to preserve as much black leader as I can between trailer. I think it provides a nice transition. But these items above prevent this from happening.

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 03-22-2001 04:01 PM

I did discuss the problem at the Inter-Society Meeting for the Enhancement of Theatrical Presentation held at ShowEast last October. I will follow up, especially with Mark Harrah of Disney, who was instrumental in implementing the Trailer Audio Standard (TASA) to control excessively loud trailer mixes. Mark has contacts in the trailer production community.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-22-2001 06:13 PM

I think most people leave the green bands on. I used to cut them off, but discontinued the practice a couple of years ago because of the sound problem Paul mentioned.

I agree that there's often not enough black leader at the beginning or end of trailers, but with so much 'controversial' material making it into trailers these days, it's probably a good idea to leave the green band on, so the disclamer covers your butt when some "concerned parent" complains about trailer material being inappropriate for kids.

Tod J. Weitzel
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 03-22-2001 07:45 PM

Isn't it about time the green band was modified to communicate more information than just "we watched this trailer and it didn't freak US out" on a pleasant green background? With all the toys the film industry has to play with these days, I'm surprised no one has tried to make a slightly less static ratings band - the thing doesn't even fade in like everything other sort of pre-feature clip.

That little box they call a TV rating at least has subcodes warning you what kind of content you might experience than just a recommended age group.

Granted, we should just reform the whole ratings process in general [read: kick the MPAA out and make an organization that ONLY rates movies according to fixed guidelines rather than the subjective garbage we have now], but the green band is about due for a tune-up.

-Tw?

------------------
Resident nerd.

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-22-2001 11:03 PM

You'll get no objections from me about fixing trailers!

Although I think the info on green (and red) bands could be updated with subcodes as you suggest, I think you'll agree that they must be standardized to be instantly recognizable by the people watching them. If you make changes to drastically then they will become useless.

However, there IS something to be said for doing something with them. With all the furor over movie ratings lately, the movie industry can use them to convey the impression to people that they really DO care about keeping movies "clean". (Or at least letting people know the differences.)

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999

posted 03-22-2001 11:26 PM

Personally, I think the studios want the ratings to be as 'bland' as possible. They really want to give out as little info as they can, so the maximum amount of people will not be put off and pay to see the film.

As with any advertising medium, you only have a few moments to "make your statement' I'm guessing this is why, soon as the required 4 seconds of green band passes, the action starts. Which means the sound (start) is going to be in the green band area.

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 03-23-2001 03:13 AM

John,

At one point I heard rumor about the MPAA possibly modifying the green colored background to be a textured background to help aid in focusing. Have you by any chance heard of any progress in that direction? I think it would be a fantastic upgrade.

To cast my vote yet again, I want at least 3 feet of PURE black at the head and tail of each trailer...no "tv cue marks" just before the green band starts...all green bands should fade up, but cut to black...and there should be enough black after the green band to permit the complete chopping off of the band as to not affect the analog soundtrack.

Of course, I'd also like to see this nonsense of showing a little clip and then flashing the studio logo put to an end. But what bothers me more is the stupid FLASH of a scene after the trailer is basically over, but before the final credit slate appears. This is the lamest thing I've ever seen and does NOTHING to help make people want to see the trailer. Mummy 2 is a good example of how lame it is...yet I am seeing this on 90% of all trailers nowadays! It's like when Fox did the late studio logo in the Speed trailer and Speed was successful, they started doing it on all of the trailers. Then someone came along with the stinger flash shot (I think it was the Twister teaser that used it first) and ever since it seems that no one can make a trailer without it. (The funny part of it all is that the editor's job is to make their trailer stand out from the rest.) Lame guys, it's just lame. Rant off.

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-23-2001 09:53 AM

Agreed to everything already said.

Personally, I'd like to see VistaVision-style framing marks (which indicate the top border for 1.66, 1.85, and 2.00:1 formats) on trailer bands, as well.

I also tend to think that there should be a PG rating for trailers. We already have G-rated and R-rated trailers, so I don't really see why the MPAA can't get it through their heads that a lot of people would be offended by some of what currently appears in G-rated trailers and that many theatres or chains refuse to show R-rated trailers for reasons unknown. A PG-rating for trailers (yellow band, perhaps?) would be a good compromise.

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 03-23-2001 10:03 AM

One of the reasons that the red band trailers are not shown is do to the fact that some people were putting them on non R-rated films. So by refusing to play them is suppose to stop this.

I do wish that the green bands were not cut off. It is a practice I really do not like doing. However, I have no choice in the matter.

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 03-23-2001 07:55 PM

They used to put these things at the end, and it was a variation of the actual rating strip logo.

I liked 'em better that way, although the ones at the beginning do let you save cutting into the soundtrack.

------------------
Better Projection Pays!

Neil Fish
Film Handler

Posts: 16
From: Norwalk, Ct
Registered: Dec 2000

posted 03-23-2001 08:06 PM

John P- There is a real concern out there regarding loud trailer mixes. I had a conversation with our Albany, NY theatre manager this week about his concern with LOUD trailers. Short of recalibrating sound systems (won't work in all cases) or automating around them (can be confusing to some projectionists doing makeup), the only solution seems to be diligence on our projectionists' part to solve it.

Incidently- The print of "Enemy" is just fine. After it dried out from a couple passes, the focus was stable.

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 03-23-2001 08:29 PM

Neil:

If you encounter excessively loud mixes on trailers, report the details to Lucasfilm THX (Ted Costas is a participant on Film-Tech). THX/TAP is hired by the MPAA to ensure that TASA (Trailer Audio Standards Association) standards for film trailers are upheld. Both trailers and features should have a mix that plays at the same fader setting, (e.g., ideally "7" on a properly aligned Dolby Digital sound system).

Trailers that do not meet the TASA standard can be denied MPAA approval:
http://www.boxoffice.com/issues/feb01/tasa.html
http://www.dolby.com/press/wb.pr.0101.AMPAS.html
http://www.dolby.com/press/meter.html

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 03-23-2001 09:01 PM

I do think that the trailer mixes have improved somewhat recently, although there are still major problems with non-trailer material, such as commercials (ugh!) and the like. I don't know who has the authority to do anything about these (except maybe NCN or Screenvision or other ad companies), but it would be nice if NATO or Film-Tech or some other "organization" could do something about this situation as well.

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 03-23-2001 10:40 PM

All our trailers are now printed overseas it seems and the censor tags are edited in at the beginning, but not very well...

Common problems are...

- Over exposed tags
- Scope tags on flat trailers
- Flat tags on scope trailers
- Ugly negative splices effecting both picture and sound

But who to complain to? The film companies here don't seem to care so 'snip' off they go.

...but isn't that progress?

------------------
"It's not the years, honey...it's the mileage". Indiana Jones

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 03-24-2001 01:51 AM

I've only noticed a drop of about 1 db in the overall level of trailers. This may be due to careful mixing to make them "sound" louder, without actually registering it on a meter, but does anyone know just how much lower they are "according to the meter" than they were a year ago? As it used to be, I ran trailers about 10db lower than the feature. Now I run them at about 9db lower.

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.