Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Believe It Or Not

   
Author Topic: Believe It Or Not
Joseph Pandolfi
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 213
From: Milford, CT.
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-19-2001 04:10 PM      Profile for Joseph Pandolfi   Email Joseph Pandolfi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A couple weeks ago we ran "The Invisible Circus". On the Saturday after opening day on my shift I was very suprised to find on this print the DA-20 was reading a flat -0- with the highest peak of 1.0 And get this on a Christie basement reader. On a normal opening weekend we are lucky that it falls below a 2.5 . I did a double take when I saw that and thought Whoever printed this film thought of those basement readers.

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-19-2001 04:50 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I work on it, I can get a Cat 700/701 read steady "3's" Sometimes it'll blink down to "0" but never steady "0's".

Basement readers are a different story.

Who set that baby up? Hats off to whoever it was!

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-19-2001 05:27 PM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen this once on a Century (CE) Basment reader and CP500. It was a fox print and never went above 1. all teh way through.
I was keeping a close eye on it as I'd just built the reader onto the mech, and literally aligned it ten minutes before the show!

Kevin Crawford
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 207
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-19-2001 08:54 PM      Profile for Kevin Crawford   Email Kevin Crawford   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw Titanic running steady 1's after 4 months of running. This was on a Simplex with a basement reader. Most impressive.

George Roher
Master Film Handler

Posts: 266
From: Washington DC
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 02-19-2001 10:56 PM      Profile for George Roher   Email George Roher   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I witnessed SRD reading 1's and 0's during a film once, but it was with a penthouse reader. What was odd was that this was in one of the dumpiest theatres I have ever seen. The machines were beyond filthy, there were piles of junk everywhere, and there was a mouse running around the booth. But the one digital house was tracking 1's and 0's. (I think it read "2" or "3" a few times, I didn't watch it throughout the entire feature). I've never seen a "0" or a "1" on an SRD unit anywhere else.

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-20-2001 01:08 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Joseph,

My findings on those Christie basement reader problems were mainly linked to the led. Some of the older leds were mounted crooked on the bracket and would not line up to give a good tracking no matter what was done. More recent replacements (manufactured within the last year or two) have yielded me 0-2 on the scale constantly with no dropouts. I have had many prints set firmly on 0 for the entire show, perhaps only a few times flickering into 1. If set up properly and not tampered with, I can honestly state that the Christie basement readers DO in fact function just fine.

On the print that tracked 0s, I'll bet it was printed by Deluxe...right? I have noticed that Deluxe prints will track constantly between 0-2 as I stated above and Technicolor lab prints generally track 3-5. I have seen this happen repeatedly with a firm pattern. Tweeking the reader to a Technicolor lab print does not seem to improve the rating anything substantial, but does hurt the readings on Deluxe prints. I have always found this odd, as Technicolor prints are the better prints "visually", but Deluxe prints have the best SRD tracks.

Michael Pace
Film Handler

Posts: 64
From: Dalby, Queensland, Australia
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 02-20-2001 05:45 AM      Profile for Michael Pace   Email Michael Pace   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am currently running 'Hannibal' here and have been getting 1's & 2's on our SRD unit with a cat 700 penthouse reader.

Michael

Bill Purdy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 139
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 02-20-2001 12:27 PM      Profile for Bill Purdy   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Purdy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, this seems like a good opportunity to speak my piece. I have noted the "basement readers suck" comments for many months and groaned each time because it simply does not have to be true. Look, all of us who make SRD readers use the same Dolby CCD circuit board as built by Dolby. We all use the same LEDs and in some cases the same lenses. As we often tell people who call in for technical assistance, "If you can shine a flashlight in the lens and see it on your 'scope, the reader is working". Period. Everything else is proper alignment and that is YOUR responsibility! The reader can read only what you put in front of it. It's the old "garbage in garbage out" bit.

You must have your light source almost perfectly even (note Brad's comments above) and bright enough to produce adequate video level. You must have the camera focused and in azimuth (the system will tolerate an amazing degree of slop) and your film path MUST be stra_________________________aight and true, both before and after the actual reader location. When you do this, along with normal housekeeping, and your projector is running more or less smoothly, you will get the good results mentioned above. Also, when doing this alignment, your best tool is a good 'scope with at least 40 to 60 mHz bandwidth. Dolby's DRAS program on your lap-top is useful, but will not give you the answers you need.

It's kind of like "film done right".

------------------
Bill Purdy
Component Engineering

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-20-2001 04:21 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, I have never had much trouble with basement readers at all and have been installing them since they became available a number of years ago. The only major problem I have had even with the Christie projector is the fact that snow from film shedding can get inside of the scanner and cover the window in the CCD Integrated circuit. I think that this has now been changed so that it is sealed better. At any rate I feel that basement readers are the better way to go as there is almost 0 chance of threading them wrong.
I have caught many operators and seen many a Cat 700 / 701 threaded wrong and running film with the display reading F. Basement readers will cure this altogether. Its always surprised me that Dolby has not done something to improve the threading path so that even a baboon could get it right.
Mark @ GTS

Kevin Crawford
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 207
From: Sacramento, CA, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 10:17 AM      Profile for Kevin Crawford   Email Kevin Crawford   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bill, I would agree with you. As a general rule the basement readers work fine.

However, the main problem I have is that oil gets in them easily. I know that this is the operators fault. However, when you have up to 8 or 9 people in a booth in a given week and management does not care, nothing gets cleaned. Then the oil gets into them. This is not the fault of the reader, just its location in the dripping fields.

The other gripe I have is one that should be solved by the projector's manufacturer. That being a not quite good enough bearing for the hold-back sprocket. Again, not the fault of the reader, but never the less, something that must be dealt with.

My preference for a theatre that I service would be to have the penthouse readers. It just makes the service call easier. If it is my booth on the other hand, I prefer the basement readers. Easier to thread, and it is easier to train people on.

Ari Nordström
Master Film Handler

Posts: 283
From: Göteborg, Sweden
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-23-2001 02:46 PM      Profile for Ari Nordström   Email Ari Nordström   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I screened "Hannibal" yesterday, with values between 2 and 4, coming from a pair of Cat 701's. Could easily have been between 0 and 1 (which happens fairly often at our theatre with new prints), had the print not been subtitled.

Subtitles can sometimes totally destroy the digital track. A subtitled British film ("East is East") I ran at the Göteborg Film Festival last year went to F and stayed there until the last reel. Probably nothing wrong with the print itself since the type of subtitles on that reel was different from the rest of the print.



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.