Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What do you know about Victoria? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: What do you know about Victoria?
Dennis Tichy
Film Handler

Posts: 32
From: Murrysville, PA, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 01-06-2001 07:23 PM      Profile for Dennis Tichy   Email Dennis Tichy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

A theatre owner recently allowed me a few minutes in a booth he no longer has in operation. The two projectors he has are Victorias---a company I know nothing about. The Victorias were gray and fitted with 6000' open magazines. They appeared to have been manufactured with no doors over the soundhead or projector. There was a turret for the lenses but no lenses. And it would appear that the Victorias do not come apart between the soundhead and projector.

Now, here are my questions for those of you who have experience with Victorias: Are they good machines?---Are they still manufactured?---Can you still get parts---Based on the sketchy information I gave you, do you have any idea what the machines might be worth. No sound equipment is included and I'm not sure I can use the Christie lamps.

Thanks for listening and thanks for your information.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-06-2001 07:27 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Victoria's are a cinemecanica projector made in Italy and there are various model that are numbered
such as Victoria4 Vic5 Vic8 Vic9 Vic10 VIc12
They tend to have a unstable picture
Some models are still manufactured Vic5 Vic8 Vic12
and others are not and in some cases there are no parts except on canablized off other machines.
Also because the optical sound head sticks out the back some lamphouses cannot be focused properly on them

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-06-2001 07:31 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You were looking at an Italian projector made by Cinemeccanica. The model is Victoria. They make a Vic5, Vic8, and a Vic12. Some people hate them. My only experience with them is that once you learn how to thread them it is very fast to thread. Brad has a link to their website at the bottom of the page under links.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-06-2001 09:02 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
I've used Vic 2's and Vic 5's. We never had much luck with them (even new) and we had a description for them which can't be printed here. I would rather project from video.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-06-2001 10:35 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some people like to call them "Shake-ameccanica" projectors.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 01-06-2001 10:40 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I like the Cinemecannica V-series. It is a more modern design, and that is why there is no seperate projector head/ sound reproducer (intergrated design.) I had read somewhere it was called the Victoria series by the manufacturer, because it supposedly marked Cinemecannica's "return" to full manufacturing capablity after World War Two.

While I find them easy to clean and thread, and the ones I used did not break often, I must admit that they can be difficult to work on when something does break. Also, the parts are VERY expensive and can take a long time to get.

I don't know which models you have, but as a reference, I saw a pair of used, in good shape, V8's (their 70mm, top-of-the-line model) go for $4000 each.

 |  IP: Logged

John Eickhof
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 588
From: Wendell, ID USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-06-2001 11:35 PM      Profile for John Eickhof   Author's Homepage   Email John Eickhof   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The 'Woppoleeneis' as I affectionately call them are fine machines, with workmanship
resembling early american projectors, such as
gears fitted with taper pins! Large gear
surfaces, and other things like the bullet proof lens turret!(msot every other company has tried to copy) However, the worst feature is the tiny shutter and poorly designed film trap. They were also the first 'all belt' projector! The V-5. Parts have to be 'hand fitted' for the early models, (V-4, V-8, V-18) Thus a machine shop is a necessary tool
needed for repair. They are a good machine and are found in daily service around the world!! However, I still prefer the good old Simplex XL!

 |  IP: Logged

Antonio Marcheselli
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1260
From: Florence, Italy
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-07-2001 05:55 PM      Profile for Antonio Marcheselli   Author's Homepage   Email Antonio Marcheselli   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I work with two Cinemeccanica V5 MI. We had no mechanical problems during the last 2 year.
I agree with the "Shake-ameccanica" nickname...
How can this shaking be minimized? What are the parts that have to be changed or reviewed when a V5 starts shaking?

Bye
Antonio

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-07-2001 06:26 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There is a longer trap assembly from cinemecania that helps. I had the best luck by glueing velvet bands (the same strips used on the DP70) to the trap and that helps alot

 |  IP: Logged

Trevor Bailey
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 113
From: Woonsocket, RI
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-07-2001 07:36 PM      Profile for Trevor Bailey   Author's Homepage   Email Trevor Bailey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You should also be aware that if they are V-5s, you can pretty much count on replacing the shutter gear box too frequently. Most complexes that have more than 8 V-5s keep a spare shutter gear box. They also have a tendancy to loose their a-chain alignment...the most common guess at the cause is the film tale catching on the cell as it runs out.

V-4s are oil bath machines and will quickly turn into paperweights if the oil level is not maintained. All of the V-4s I have seen use 3 phase motors which are rather expensive to replace. Quite a few also seem to have sound issues due to the design of the sound drum - shaft - flywheel.

I would stick with a Simplex 35...

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-07-2001 07:55 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good point on the A-chain alignment issues with V-5s. I've never aligned the soundhead on one, but apparently it requires repeatedly removing and replacing the sound drum and it doesn't look like much fun. On the plus side, they're easy to clean and the lens turret is nice if you only show two formats (and it is a pain if you regularly switch among four formats...).

I'm not a real fan of the V5, which is the only Cinemeccanica machine that I've used. I suppose you could do worse, but I'd take Centurys or Simplexes over V5s any day.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-07-2001 08:30 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the shutter gear box issue that can be corrected. The problem is lack of lubrication.
they are filled with grease at the factory and sealed. After running for a while the greese is caked around the outside of the box not near the gears.
Two things that have virtually stopped the gear box replacement issue for us
1 fit a greese gun nipple in the top of the gear box and montly give it a squirt of greese
2 Mix STP with the existing greese to thin it so that it falls back to the gears

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Lyman
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 01-08-2001 02:26 AM      Profile for Alan Lyman   Email Alan Lyman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I work with V5īs every day,both new ones and old ones.,and I STILL like them.Off course the V8īs are better,but also more expensive.The v5īs are easy to repair,you can just send a new piece to the theater,and they can replace it themselves.A lot of other projectors,a technician has to go there to repair it.
For the V5,there is a new complete new gate assembly,with much more picturesteadiness.Itīs a hole new design.The only thing is,it needs to work with their new
apertureplate changer.
The shutterbox,needs to be refilled every year,with grease.But also a soft start of the projector helps alot.The shutterboxes that we have broken,has always been because off too fast startup.
Cinemeccanicaprices in USA is more expensive
than american projectors,because there not so many of them over there.
If you put the original RED LED kit on a Cinemeccanica,you wont have anymore A-chain problems.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Frandsen
Master Film Handler

Posts: 270
From: Denmark, Europe
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-13-2001 04:35 AM      Profile for Martin Frandsen   Email Martin Frandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am a big fan of my V8. Those machines seem to keep runing for ever, as long as you poor oil in it! I have no problem with any jitter in the picture ( and i am not using the new gate! ) Why so many have problems with picture jitter i have no clue?

------------------
Martin Frandsen
Film crazy!, Big 70mm fan!

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 01-13-2001 08:48 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many V8's do have a slightly higher jitter than other manufacturers when running 35mm. 70mm seems to be OK (similar to other makes.) I used to suspect that the reason is the flat gate and the intermittent shaft is not supported on the outside, like other makes (JJ's AA-II's , etc.) But, every projector has it's goods and bads.

Just about every part I have ordered fit with out any machining. But working on the projectors can be tough if you're not used to them.

They are made in Italy, and their techniques throw off some American service techs, who (unfairly, I think) bad-mouth the thing. For example, they use taper pins to hold gears on shafts, whereas America projectors usually have set screws. ("I don't have a pin punch to get that shutter gear off in V8.. stupid machine sucks!" Or, sometimes special tools are needed. ("I don't have that tapered tool to put the feed sprocket shaft back in a V9.. stupid machine blows!")

I also think the projector is made with generally tighter tolerances. So if a gear won't fit on a shaft, check that the shaft isn't rusty or mushroomed at the end before whaling on it with a hammer.

Scrutinize any projector, and you will find flaws. Cinemeccanica's are no worst than other.

Admittedly, the A-chain aligning the first stereo solar cells made for the V5,8,9's was/is pure hell.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.