Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Fuji film stocks?

   
Author Topic: Fuji film stocks?
Nic Margherio
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: St. Louis MO, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-15-2000 07:53 PM      Profile for Nic Margherio   Email Nic Margherio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone who visits this forum somewhat regularly must know a thing or two about different types of Kodak release stocks thanks to John Pytlak's expertise, but what of Fuji? Several distributors use Fuji stock at least ocasionally and some use it exclusively. What are the different types? How do they compare to Kodak stocks? How do you interpret the edge-markings? Are there any Fuji reps registered?

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 09-15-2000 09:39 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From my experiences, Fuji polyester stocks rarely ever shed and are practically static-free, and older trailers and prints on Fuji stock hold color very well compared to Eastman SP...

I also like Agfa stocks, especially the early to mid-80's vintages

Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-16-2000 04:07 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
They definitely sport a completely different look. "Detroit Rock City" for example looked absolutely magnificent on Fuji stock. The colors are a little bit more pronounced in general, but that doesn't always achieve a good look. Ideally the film print stock should be left up to the director of photography.

Unfortunately, I've found some projectors tend to have stability problems if Fuji prints are not properly lubricated.

 |  IP: Logged

Stefan Scholz
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 223
From: Schoenberg, Germany
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 09-16-2000 06:28 AM      Profile for Stefan Scholz   Author's Homepage   Email Stefan Scholz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Recently I had the chance to attend a 70 mm screening of a 1971 film, made in East Germany. This film had the biggest density and contrast ratio pof any film I had ever seen. It seemed, it was printed to match the 22kW carbon arc they used at the time beeing. The color was fantastastic, rich in detail and saturation.
The print has not been in "proper storage", at least from 1971 to 1996, but there was no degrading in color, no fading or vinegar syndrome, or defects in mag traxx.
It was one of the best 70 mm adventures in my life.
Print stock was Orwo (rumors say, the neg was Kodak, that's for the colors we saw).
Just to say, not only Kodak makes good stock, a lot depends on the skills of the color timers and other lab workers. I have seen beautiful Agfas from the mid 80's as well as great Fuji prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-16-2000 06:33 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've definitely found that, at least with still photography, labs that "mostly" deal with Kodak stock can't usually make other brands of film look as good and vice-versa. There's definitely a lab issue here that isn't specificly related to the stock itself; I would assume that the same holds true with motion-picture stocks.
As for color fading, old Agfa stock looks best to me. Eastman turns red (or, in the case of SP stock, brown) and Fuji turns to a weird blue stage. So far, Eastman LPP (post-1982) looks fine, though.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-18-2000 06:13 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Film stocks constantly evolve (and hopefully improve), so it's inaccurate and unfair to make generalizations comparing film stocks of different generations.

For a history of Kodak motion picture films, see the "Chronology of Eastman Kodak Motion Picture Films":
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/about/chrono4.shtml

Scott is correct that prints on Kodak print film made since 1982 have excellent keeping properties, and show minimal change in color if processed and stored properly. AFAIK, older European stocks used dye systems that are incompatible with modern processes.

The first major incidents of "static cling" were NOT on Kodak film ("American President", November 1995). NATO received reports of static problems on "English Patient", "Michael", "Scream", "The Apostle", etc., which were printed on other film stocks. All film manufacturers publicly acknowledged more static problems with polyester print films. Kodak VISION Color Print Film has a transparent conductive anti-static backing layer to help control static, and Kodak developed an anti-static process additive that many film labs are applying to ALL prints to control static. Because of these Kodak developments, "static cling" incidents are greatly reduced.

Print "shedding" is dependent on a variety of factors, including projector design, gate tension, print lubrication, relative humidity, etc. Unfortunately, most labs no longer follow Kodak's long-standing recommendations on print lubrication:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/processing/h242/h2402_04.shtml#164364

Proper edge-waxing helps prints resist projector abrasion, which can be severe in some cases. Kodak VISION Color Print Film is much more resistant to abrasion, and performs well in most projectors, even without edge-waxing. Other manufacturer's films have had projector abrasion and "shedding" issues as well.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.