Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Digital EX/ES with old Processor ?

   
Author Topic: Digital EX/ES with old Processor ?
Nic Dreier
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Basel, Switzerland, Europe
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-21-2000 05:53 PM      Profile for Nic Dreier   Email Nic Dreier   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi there

Yesterday I was discussing with a friend of mine, how we could use our old sound processors (all CP-50) in the time of Digital Sound. Now that was our idea: What about connecting the RS/LS-Line-Output of the current Digital System to the CP-50 to play back a EX/ES encoded film ? I think you would need to double the RS/LS-Line. One goes into Non-Sync (for normal 5.1 tracks) and the other line goes into "to Adapter Right/Left". so that the signal is sent through the matrix. For EX/ES playback you simply push "Stereo with no surround" (=Rear Left/Rear Center/Rear Right), and for regular surround push Non-Sync (with an additional switch to combine the splitted speaker array on the rear wall).

So what do you think about that ? Would it be possible to achieve a proper decoding of the rear center channel, or is it simply a gimmick ? I'm very interested in your opinions !

Have a nice day

Best Regards

Nic

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gouger
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 501
From: Bradenton, FL, USA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-21-2000 08:04 PM      Profile for Alan Gouger   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gouger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nic
What you are describing will work but for $300 US dollars why not get the SmartCS-3X jr.
You will end up with superior seperation with the smart. It also has a pass thru built in for your current surrounds.

 |  IP: Logged

Nic Dreier
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Basel, Switzerland, Europe
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 03:36 AM      Profile for Nic Dreier   Email Nic Dreier   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I already thought about the "Smart Junior." But why expending more than 300$ (in Switzerland it's more expensive !), when you can do it for free with some older equipment? And by the way, the "SmartJr-Solution" wouldn't have a proper EQ-tuning possibility for each channel. I don't know, if the channel separation with the Smart would be much better ?! I just like that old equippment, and it would break my heart to throw it away.

Bye

Nic

 |  IP: Logged

Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler

Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 07:01 AM      Profile for Oscar Neundorfer   Author's Homepage   Email Oscar Neundorfer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nic,

What you are describing will probably work, and you will not have to spend much money to put it all together. While Alan is correct that the CS-3X, Jr. will work, you are right in that it will not provide the EQ function that you should have in a theatre. The CS-3X, Jr. is a great product, but it was designed for consumer use and is more suited to that task in terms of connectors and automation features.

If you were going to spend money to do the job, then I would recommend the CS-3X professional version which has EQ and the automation features you need, or the Panastereo SP23 which is the top of the line product for this purpose in my opinion.

Also, one thing to investigate is this: what matrix is in the CP50? You would want a later version matrix to get the best performance.

Oh, one last thing: NEVER, NEVER throw anything away!!!

Best regards,

------------------
Oscar Neundorfer
Chief Engineer
SMART Devices, Inc.

oscar@smartdev.com


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-22-2000 08:18 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since I believe in 1/3 octave eq on the surrounds and hated giving that up with a full cp200 when we added ex we used a cp50 for the eq as it has cat 64b's in it
also we slaved the cp200 fader to it so the ex wasn't pre fader
We took theoutput of the DA20/DTS70 failsafe ls and rs through a 6 pole relay
one way the outputs of the DA 20 go to the cp50 and the 3 surround outs go to the amps
if the relay is relaxed the internal 1/3 octave of the cp200 is in effect for normal playback
Oscar as usual is right NEVER THROW ANYTHING OUT

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Cutler
Master Film Handler

Posts: 277
From: Centennial, CO
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 09:14 AM      Profile for Dave Cutler   Email Dave Cutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like a great use of some older equipment. Wish I had some spare processors sitting around. Of course then I would need extra amplifiers and speakers (I don't have surrounds on the back wall).

I use a similar technique with my home cinema to get an EX/ES channel. It's really cool for DVD.

 |  IP: Logged

Nic Dreier
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Basel, Switzerland, Europe
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-22-2000 03:38 PM      Profile for Nic Dreier   Email Nic Dreier   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Oscar,

Holy cow (not the THX one !!! I would never throw a CP-50 away !!!!! Even if there's absolutely no use for it, I would rather build a museum for that unit than throwing it away

According to the Matrix-Cat. I have to check that, but I think it's a cat150B, cause we use these cards in all theaters. I heard about the newer models, but my local tech told me, there wouldn't be a difference between the models, and because money is always a problem, we had to stay with the old ones. Is it such a big difference between a cat150B and a newer model, that upgrading makes sense ? How much is the price in the US for the newer models ?

So I think I have to check the CP's (for future use) !!!

Bye

Nic

 |  IP: Logged

Oscar Neundorfer
Master Film Handler

Posts: 275
From: Senoia, GA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-23-2000 05:56 AM      Profile for Oscar Neundorfer   Author's Homepage   Email Oscar Neundorfer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really am not all that knowledgeable regarding the differences between the various versions of the CAT150 cards. I was more concerned that you might have a really old matrix. I think it was the CAT116 card, but I just don't know. Maybe Gordon or someone else can fill in the details here. It's all I can do to keep up with what SMART makes

------------------
Oscar Neundorfer
Chief Engineer
SMART Devices, Inc.

oscar@smartdev.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.