This critic was a huge advocate of good projection practices, even running special articles listing problems with screenings and comments on presentation. He really cared about what went on the screen.

The print arrived today, and the last place that ran the film had ruined the print. It was totally unwatchable. This place has outstanding equipment and one of the most professional operators around, and they had to resort to showing the film from a VHS tape. They have some excellent video equipment, and it looked as good as it could, but it wasn't the same as a 35mm print. (They offered to refund peoples admission, but since it was a free screening...it really didn't matter!!)

They are also showing a series of older "B" movies this summer. They chose to run an old drag race film called "GHOST FROM DRAGSTRIP HOLLOW". MGM had a print, and the booking was arranged, but when they pulled it for shipping, MGM discovered that their only screening print was trashed.

Now, these aren't great cinematic masterpieces. But they are fine examples of work by a serious and well regarded playwright or examples of a long lost genre. It's just too bad that these and so many other films are just disappearing...slowly, slowy, one by one.

What most scares me about the rush to digital screenings is that so many films will be left behind to rot. Yes, there will be some die hards that hold on to film, but once that pricing bubble bursts, digital projection will be everywhere.

I hope we don't lose too many treasures in the process.

 |  IP: Logged

When we ordered it, they (MGM ?) told us that the print was too damaged to play. My boss complained to them that he had booked this print over 3 months in advance and they flew Lev Theremins neice from Russia, or some place, just for the event... They BETTER send us something!

Well, they sent it to us anyway, warts and all. It turned out that it wasn't THAT bad. It had a bunch of busted-out sprocket holes and it was a but chopped up. With a little extra time in the build up, (and about a 1/2 dozen trips through the FilmGuard) it was fine. (As good as it could be, anyway.) No worse than a lot of other prints that I've seen.

If any of us "trash" a print because of our own incompetence or carelessness, SHAME! Learn how to handle film properly, and treat every print with care.

If a print is damaged because we don't have the right equipment, or enough time to do a good job, SHAME! Keep "fighting city hall" to get the equipment you need and the extra time to do a good job of maintenance and inspection.

If a print is damaged because someone else's carelessness caused a problem that we didn't try to fix, SHAME! Remake bad splices, repair torn perfs, use a film cleaner, do whatever it takes to "turn a sows ear into a silk purse".

If something is wrong with the "system", don't stop trying to change it. Return defective reels, document problems, suggest solutions, be the "squeeky wheel". Don't ignore problems, try to fix them. But do it in a CONSTRUCTIVE way. Despite our rage, calling a fellow operator a "moron" will not help them do a better job. But working with them to improve their film handling skill or understand the problems their "shortcuts" cause for others, will have a positive effect.

Rant "off".

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

Incredible! This happened some time ago with a print of Smokey and the Bandit as well...

If the studios are going to continue to posess the copyright on these titles, they should be made to have the original format of the copyrighted works available to be seen. If not, relinquish the rights to someone who WILL keep the prints and not junk them all into oblivion because someone says 'Aw, no-one will ever run that again. Let's junk it and we can use the space'.

Over here, the oldest Fox title in the country on 35mm is Rocky Horror from 1975 and THAT'S only because it still gets run from time to time and at regular late shows in the capital cities. The next oldest title at Fox is Chariots Of Fire.

 |  IP: Logged

Films from the '20's we can still show. Video from the '50's and '60's can't be played on modern machines.

Video and DLP has its place, but film still seems best for archives.

If there are silent screenings your area, take the time to support them.

1. The fact that these prints are shown less often for every time they are made up and packed off. If you show a print five times a day for a month then with good film path cleaning and maintenance, there shouldn't be much problem keeping it like new. Howevever, if it is being made up, shown once, stripped down again and transported over and over again, there will inevitably be more wear and tear, however carefully it is handled.

2. There are less copies of these prints made and so each one does more work. Rep and re-release distributors do not have the money to make hundreds (or even tens) of prints, so a smaller number of copies takes longer to go round the cinemas, being handled more intensively all the while. For example, we are currently showing L'ENNUI, print no. 1., and last week we showed FLAMENCO, print no. 2. I'd be very surprised if there are more than 5 in circulation.

3. Defective equipment and/or moron projectionists. Remember that a lot of these prints get shown in universities, arts centres that only show films once or twice a week, film clubs and other venues where the equipment isn't great and the projectionist won't have had proper training or much experience. Basically, the places where people really want to see arthouse and rep are exactly the places which are likely to bugger the prints. This is a dilemma for the distributor - he can bet his bottom dollar that (i) the print will be abused, and (ii) that venue will get sell-out houses. So he can't really embargo the place because their projection is bad without shooting himself in the foot.

I do agree with a previous contributor that the answer is for all cinemas to complain loudly and demand new prints when they receive an NFG one. I send condition reports to our head office on a regular basis whenever I get a print with tramlines, rewind scratches, edge damage or any other evidence of misuse, but I have a stong suspicion that they end up in the small round filing cabinet on the floor.