Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » OK, If you don't like CAP codes, what would you do?

   
Author Topic: OK, If you don't like CAP codes, what would you do?
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 06-28-2000 06:30 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Obviously, it has to be on the print. It has to be able to keep up with hi-speed printing while being applied. It can't be easily edited out.

Off hand, I can't think of something significantly better. What would you suggest?

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-28-2000 06:41 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know this would not work after the film was transferred to video, but what about getting Dolby and/or Sony to somehow imbed some sort of print number in the digital information on the film.

This probably would not be helpful with tracing the origin of pirated tapes, but you could identify recovered prints and get the source theatre/depot.

Russ

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-28-2000 11:21 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You could just convert the entire industry to digital cinema. That way video copies look really good. None of that annoying shutter flicker.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-29-2000 06:18 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
This is a very simple one. I'm surprised the minds at Kodak haven't thought of this one yet. Just manufacture the rolls of film in 100 foot sections! Then join them together, making sure to intentionally misframe the next splice by one perf and send the final "edited" roll to the labs for printing. The intentional misframing would ensure that at least 3 out of 4 splices would show on screen, thus creating one hell of a mark viewable on even a 30th generation video copy!

It would be great! Every single print would then have it's own special on-screen code different from all the other prints! Plus, there wouldn't be any of that annoying CAP code marks that resemble dirt on the film!!! Yes, this would be perfect, as there aren't enough lab splices within prints as it is.

(Of course I'm kidding. The CAP code is probably the best thing given the circumstances.)


 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-29-2000 08:39 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Film is sensitive to wavelengths that the human eye can't see. (UV, IR, etc.) Film can be made to couple certain wavelengths to certain dyes. And, those dyes don't necessarily have to produce any given "color". That's how multi-contrast photographic paper works, you're just filtering different wavelengths that "activate" different layers in the emulsion.

Video cameras are sensitive to wavelengths that human's can't see, either. Further, they don't necessarily have to couple with any color that's visible on the TV screen. (IR light looks blue in a video cam. -- Counter-intuitive until you think for a while.)

Just supposing here but if you built a layer into the film that was sensitive to only a very narrow band of IR/UV light and coupled that to a dye that filtered a wavelength that TV cameras could register but couldn't display, you could put anything you want on the film. For instance, you could put vertical stripes down the film that resemble bar codes in the supermarket. They could be recorded on video tape but since they are just outside of the CRT's ability to display them, the only way to see them would be to play the tape through some sort of video analyzer. An oscilloscope, for instance.
The scope would display a pattern of "pips" like this that correspond to the location of the lines in the "bar code", like this.

--------^---^------^----^^----------------

This could be throughout the whole length of a reel (or reels) and there would be no way of removing it or even finding it unless you scientifcally analyzed the film.


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-30-2000 12:23 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, this is a long shot, but most if not all camcorders can pick up IR. Point your remote control at your camera and press a button. See the flashing light on the screen? The human eye can't see that in real life, but the camera can. Now take into account that most cinema screens are perforated, at least the ones that show movies that people would want to pirate. It would cost some money, but there could be an array of IR LED's scattered behind the screen that flash constantly while the projector is running. The human eye wouldn't see this, but the camera could not avoid it, and it would totally ruin any copy made.

I suppose the flaws with this idea would be that someone could power off the IR LED array, and there may be filters available for cameras to block stuff like that.


 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-30-2000 02:24 AM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joe, my ex brother in law used to be an engineer at a TV station. Had I ever wanted to lead a life of crime, I'd have taken my prints there.

There's no screen to put IR LEDs behind. When they showed film (yes, I'm that old) they projected directly into a camera. Used a light source and everything!

I'll try and get him to register here. He's a computer geek now, but he was once a top notch TV guy.

AND! He's older than me so I'll feel better too!

Russ


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-30-2000 07:04 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Infrared "watermarking" is certainly feasible, as many video cameras do "see" infrared light that the human eye cannot see.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.