Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » crappiest companies? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: crappiest companies?
Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-21-2000 10:46 PM      Profile for Ethan Harper   Email Ethan Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
who was the crappiest company that you have worked for and why or any other horror stories you might have. while working within a company.

here is mine

where i work now i am employed by an audio visual company to run the booth at a theater.

The problems:
i was originally offered 12 an hr. by the owner of the theater. The a\v\ company said "all that we are budgeted for is to pay you 10" so iwas stupid and agreed. well twa recently that the other 2 dollars an hour was being charged to the theater instead of me. so the owner had always thought that i was getting 12 when i was really getting ten. i was enraged and so was he. they siad that they would look into it. does anybody have any suggestions for me?

do projectionists ever get the respect they desrve? i guess not.

two it is a 7-plex where everything is manually run because the a\v people ripped out the existing automation and is trying to currently put it into an amx unit, but i seriously dont think they know how. although they say they do, it would have been done over a month ago when the theater opened.

the general manager thinks he can own me although i dont work for him.

it seems that it is our fault and we get yelled at if stuff on the a\v side is not correct or god forbid we have to start a movie at the same time when credits go up in another auditorium

"how come the lights are not up, turn them on NOW!!!" no we dont have starts at the same time.

"Ethan if that pizza box is there in the morning we are going to be switching words tomorrow!" -general manager
since when are you respomsible for the booth? is the question i would ask him. i work really hard for my prints and this is what i get?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-22-2000 02:17 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>>"Ethan if that pizza box is there in the morning we are going to be switching words tomorrow!" -general manager<<

Ethan,

If that's all he has to complain to you about, I think he should thank the good Lordy that you are there and stop bitching to you about trivialities.

Of course, I am assuming he means 'there' to be in the bin or on the table, not wrapped up inside a print.


 |  IP: Logged

Jim Ziegler
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 753
From: West Hollywood, CA
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 05-22-2000 03:16 AM      Profile for Jim Ziegler   Email Jim Ziegler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The worst company I ever worked for was Hollywood (now Wallace).. I lasted all of 6 weeks with them...

The reason I left can be summed up with a quote from the general manager (this is an exact quote, BTW), " The customers dont care what happens on the screen as long as the concession lines are short and they have cupholders."

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2000 07:30 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>The a\v\ company said "all that we are budgeted for is to pay you 10" so i was
>stupid and agreed. well twa recently that the other 2 dollars an hour was being
>charged to the theater
instead of me. so the owner had always
>thought that i was getting 12 when i was really getting ten. i was enraged and so
>was he. they siad that they would look into it. does anybody have any suggestions for me?

I'm not understanding your complaint. If your services are being contracted out doesn't it stand to reason that your employer is going to get a cut of it? If you go have your car repaired and the labor charge is $75/hr do you think the mechanic gets all of that? Two bucks an hour is nothing. Keep in mind that there are payroll taxes to be paid (employer's part of social security and medicare, federal unemployment, state unemployment) and that eats up about half of those two dollars. Workman's comp probably eats up the rest, maybe more. Hell, they're probably losing money on you.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-22-2000 10:09 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would agree with Steve on this. You agreed to work for $10hr; you must have thought that was fair. That you were sub-contracted out by the AV company is a different issue; they can (and should) charge whatever they can get.

If the owner offered you $12hr, and the AV company only offered $10hr, why did you stay with them? I guessing the AV company had some other advantage you thought loosing $2hr was worth.

But after all, you are a 'free agent.' Ask if the owner still willing to give you $12hr. Or maybe it's simply time to look for another place to work and move on.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-22-2000 11:53 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Steve, Welcome finally! What the heck took you so long?
My question is.... To Ethan, are you paying self employment taxes or is that part being taken care of for you? If you are paying taxes you should have gone for the 12.00 but if they are taking it out then its worth the 2 bucks an hour. It costs them alot more than that.
Mark


 |  IP: Logged

Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2000 03:38 PM      Profile for Ethan Harper   Email Ethan Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
to john and steve

on the issue of my payroll.

well, i was offered by the owner of the theater 12 an hr. the a\v company said that all they could pay me was 10 hr. there was a contract between the theater and the a\v company to pay me 12 an hr. i did not know this till recently. if they wanted to make a profit off of me maybe they should of charged a little bit more to the owner? Illegally they are scheming my 2 dollars. The owner was not aware of this till i told him how much my rate is right now. we were both enraged.

then again question i ask is this,
who in their right minds hires an a\v company to hire their projectionists for them?
especially if the a\v company has no idea what the power button on the lamphouse does.

they are now considering the thought of putting me on a salary? has that been heard of? A proj. on salary. I guess i would not mind as long as i am making a little above the average amount as to what i am supppose to be making. the only difference that there is suppose to be for me between working here and the theater is this. i am under the a\v\ payroll which the oewner pays for each hour that i work here it just a different check, and i have a\v benefits.

if you found out that your being ripped off from what are you are contracted by the theater to being payed how would you feel?

------------------
--"That's my story and i'm sticking to it!"--

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-22-2000 04:22 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Salary is great if you put your foot down and walk out the door at 40.1 hours. Otherwise, they will use "salary" as a way to work you 60-80 hours a week ending up with far LESS than you would make hourly. Be careful and get everything in writing.

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2000 05:12 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, Brad is correct. But! If you get hit by a bus on the way to work, you still get paid if you are salary.

I haven't called in sick for a couple of years, but it's nice to know that my income would be stable if I had to.

Russ

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-22-2000 06:44 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't understand how you can say the $2.00 per hour is illegal
They could sell your services fo $50.00 per hour and keep the $40.00 per difference if they chose. They are your employer not the theatre
The theatre probably chose to hire the AV company so they did not have to pay WC and benifits but a flat amount

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 05-22-2000 06:53 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Salary isn't good, unless you have the limits set from the beginning, as Brad said.

And you can bet if you DO get hit by a bus, the company will do everything in its power to find a way AROUND paying you, that much you can bank on.

Employees ARE worked 70-80 hrs a week or more on salary, because when an outfit gets you in such an arrangement, they OWN you. Get those hours stipulated, in writing, BEFORE entering into an agreement.

Perfect example: my brother drives a truck. He makes nearly $100,000 a year, BUT (and here's the catch) he's gone most of the time, sleeps here and there whenever he can catch 20 minutes or so, and works enough hours that it comes out to little better than MINIMUM WAGE for the time he's investing. Further, he has no time to enjoy the money he makes, because he's gone all the time, driving the stinkin' truck!

------------------
Better Projection Pays!


 |  IP: Logged

Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-22-2000 07:43 PM      Profile for Ethan Harper   Email Ethan Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
aacchh
reply to gordon

i am not trying to make a fuss or anything really i am not and i do apologize if it seems this way.

but there was a contract from the a\v company and the theater to pay me 12 an hr. not 10an hr. that is what makes it wrong if they wanted to make a profit then they should charge the theater 14 an hr instead of stealing what in the contract is stated to be given to me.

------------------
--"That's my story and i'm sticking to it!"--

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-22-2000 10:10 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with others regarding being paid a salary; it sounds good until they start to work you over 40 hours. But, since you work there now, you must already have a good idea how many hours per week are required.

Laws vary from state to state, but usually as an hourly employee, you should get overtime pay for working over 8 hours in a day and over 40 hours in a week. Where I am, there are laws that protect an hourly employee more than a salaried employee.

So, there are goods and bads either way. But, I still don't see anything illegal. Although, if I understand things correctly, that AV company may have lied to you to get you to work cheaper. Which is a crappy thing, no doubt, but not illegal.

As I said, you might be in a good position to work directly for the owner. It seems like the theater owner needs you, and you don't need the AV company. With no automation, it would be tough to replace you.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-23-2000 05:21 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
In Texas, all they have to do is give you an hour's break (off the clock) for working over 8 hour shifts. Of course, I've never known anyone to actually abide by this law in regards to salaried employees.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-23-2000 11:51 AM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To the best of my understanding, being paid salary does not necessarily preclude you from receiving overtime.

I don't have the specifics in front of me, but there is criteria on what makes a certain employee "EXEMPT" or "NON-EXEMPT" from the labor laws. If your situation made you NON-EXEMPT in ANY of the areas... then you were still eligible for overtime and the whole enchilada.

I know that I am exempt because I supervise more than 10 other employees. I am also exempt because I can make decisions that affect the rest of the company. I believe another is that I spend more than 50% of my time SUPERVISING people; were I to be spending more than 50% of my time DOING what it is I was supervising, then I would be non-exempt.

Those are at least two of the ideas behind it. Check it out with your states Labor Commission --- the State of California is always helpful in answering those sort of questions.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.