Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » "Small Time Crooks" Sound?

   
Author Topic: "Small Time Crooks" Sound?
Nic Margherio
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: St. Louis MO, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-19-2000 12:44 AM      Profile for Nic Margherio   Email Nic Margherio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did anyone recieve the standard Woody Allen letter regarding sound presentation for "Small Time Crooks?" - you know, the one that says the print is SR-encoded but should only play back in the center speaker? I didn't get one but I did notice that the soundtrack was mixed only for the center channel. The other thing that I could not figure out is why it carried an SRD and DTS track. (Has anyone played it back in either of these formats? I'd be interested to know if it only played back through the center channel.) I thought that Dreamworks' "policy" was to release all their movies with all three digital formats. Why no SDDS? Why did Woody allow SRD and DTS? Throw me a frickin' bone here.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-19-2000 12:55 AM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Woody Allen has always released his prints in mono. He uses the stereo track and SR and Digital because they are the current soundtracks. He prefers his sound to come out of the center channel for artistic reasons. He once included in his projectionist letter that he used SR for the noise reduction but to turn off all the other amplifiers.

Woody Allen is an accomplished musician. He plays the clarinet in a local NY jazz band. You would think that he knows a lot about sound. By his letters I think he knows a lot about projection. He just prefers mono. Go figure.

I have always appreciated his notes to the projectionist. Even if I am confused by the man.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-19-2000 05:05 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok, I'll be the one to say it...Woody Allen is a freak! With today's technologies all he will allow is mono sound. Geesch, what more can I say. Perhaps some will argue some artistic nonsense and back good ol' Woody, but the man really should consider utilizing the sound technology that is available to improve on his filmmaking as far as I'm concerned. He should be doing stage plays.

To answer your question, yes the digital tracks hold nothing more than the center channel. Why this took 2 DTS discs I have no idea. Certainly ONE channel of audio could've been burned onto one cd...but perhaps there is a technical thing I do not know about regarding DTS encoding. As to SDDS, he probably didn't want the digital cutting in and out, which is respectable.

I seriously hope everyone presenting this flick in digital took the time to load up the most impressive sound demo logo they have to run right before the whole sound system collapses to mono.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-19-2000 08:21 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually I remeber that Mr Allen started using mono because he felt that he couldn't count on the surround level in theatres not being goosed up to high and being distracting (not an uncommon thing to occur)
But at least he releases on film not DLP

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-19-2000 10:55 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
After seeing several of the poor equipment installations around here, I think running in mono might be the right idea after all.

 |  IP: Logged

Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 05-19-2000 10:44 PM      Profile for Dwayne Caldwell   Email Dwayne Caldwell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess Woody Allen's too old fashion to resort to today's sound reproduction standards. I do appreciate his notes to the projectionist though. I remember when Bullets Over Broadway was released, he made mention of the fact that there was a few seconds of black on the beginning of one of the reels and explained the reasoning for this and for the projectionist to expect it. I which the directors that shoot a few of their P.O.V. scenes upside down would warn the projectionist and spare us the brief heartattack when we just happen to look out the port glass at the wrong time. The chances are rare, but it'd be nice to be told anyway.

------------------
The man with the magic hands.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-19-2000 11:25 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Didn't Woody let his hair down (?) with "Everyone Says I Love You" and throw some stereo into the musical numbers?

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph Pandolfi
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 213
From: Milford, CT.
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 05-21-2000 11:02 AM      Profile for Joseph Pandolfi   Email Joseph Pandolfi   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Modern Times are really catching up to Woody Allen. "Digital" tracks, How about that "Tequila" by The Champs 60 seconds before credits ended. I thought the non-sync kicked in too early.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-21-2000 12:29 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nic Margherio asked:
>Has anyone played it back in either of these formats?
>I'd be interested to know if it only played back through the center channel.

Yes. I previewed the film twice and I played SR-D the first time (there was no disk with that print) and DTS the second time. It's center channel only. The DTS track I had was a single disk.

Woody Allen feels that the story and the acting are the most important elements in his films so not only does he use mono sound but also keeps his titles a very simple white on black.

As for digital the reason is the same as for using SR: high fidelity. Some of you may not realize that on a cinema processor when you punch mono not only is the noise reduction disabled and the stereo matrix switched to simply sum Left-Total and Right-Total into the Center channel but a very severe high frequency roll off known as the Academy filter is introduced. Mono films have a pre-emphasis that takes this into account but it still greatly limits the fidelity.

This is because the mono standard is based on 1930's technology and was one of the reasons that before Dolby came along people were certain that optical sound was simply incapable of high quality. Dolby threw that out to allow the full range to come through, added EQ, and compensated for the added hiss with their noise reduction. This resulted in the Dolby Mono (optical) process that predates Dolby Stereo. You select this format easily with a CP-50, 100, and 200 but not directly on later processors, hence Woody Allen movies being labeled for Dolby Stereo or Dolby Stereo SR playback even though they are Dolby Mono. They play fine in stereo mode though you can avoid leakage through the wrong channels by shutting down those amps.

Even on a CP-500 where you can custom program formats you can program one with SR NR *on* but if tell the matrix you want mono that is where the Academy roll off is invoked. So if you want to create a custom format for Dolby SR Mono what you would do would be leave the matrix in Pro Logic mode but go to the patchbay-like output matrix (where outputs of the processing section are sent on their way to the B chain EQ and fader) and lift the connections from everything except C. Or C & Sub. (Actually just copy format 05 Dolby SR and go right to the output matrix and change that and you're done.)

Getting back to Woody Allen, using digital not only enables maximum fidelity with no worries of leakage through the wrong channels but the added benefit of making splices inaudible, too.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.