Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » SRD Question...

   
Author Topic: SRD Question...
Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-09-2000 07:08 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In anticipation of the change in analog soundtrack printing, we have removed all of our exciter lamps and replaced them with Kelmar LED reverse scan readers.

What about digital? We have one visible light Dolby Digital reader that was already in place before we retrofitted the complex to all digital sound. All the others are LED.

Do I need to replace this reader with a new one?

Russ

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-09-2000 08:15 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An interesting question....

On the one hand the visable light basement readers are a pain in that they tend to make the soundhead cramped and hot, they are more forgiving and cheaper to run. You could buy a box of 10 EPT lamps for the cost of one visable red LED...anybody can change the EPT lamp whereas the LED really needs to be aligned by a technician. The EPT lamp tends to work until it needs to be replace...the LED needs to have it's current increased throughout it's life.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Burroughs
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 654
From: Allen, TX
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2000 09:00 PM      Profile for Jason Burroughs   Email Jason Burroughs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't the main reson for switching to visable red LED's due to the upcomming switch to the silver less soundtracks? Be it Cyan or Magenta... and aren't all digital soundtracks processes much the same way that the image iself is and not affected by the change to silver less dyes. So with that assumption it would not matter wether a digial reader had white light or red LEDs as the light source, am I correct?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-09-2000 09:12 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
All future prints will play just fine with a cat699 or cat700 penthouse soundhead. There is no reason to change it out.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-09-2000 09:15 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As quoted from Kodak: Dye Sound Tracks-
A Laboratory Guide:

"The three prominent digital sound systems can and do accommodate dye only images for their digital sound or control data."

For a pdf copy of this report goto:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/dyetrack.shtml

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-09-2000 09:28 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jason! You nailed it! *g*

The reason for switching the analog readers was because I was told that the new print process would not be read accurately with visible light.

Will the SRD printed info be equally un-readable as is the analog track? A slide projector bulb is visible light (and they said I'd never use my high school projection again!).

I am confused because we are still sending visible (xenon) light through the image and it is still hitting the screen.

I don't understand exactly why the exciters won't work, but I accept it. I assume that the same dyes would be provided across the entite width of the print. Can this affect the resolution on the digital reader as well?

If so, I will have my biggest auditorium playing in SR (through that nasty 222-SRA *g*) until I can get a new reader shipped!

I have asked this question almost everywhere, and I always get "HMMMMM" as an answer.

I have read the other posts here and I have not had any problems with SRD.

Just a curious question...

Russ

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 05-09-2000 09:48 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Brad! I'll keep it then.

Could someone please explain why visible light will have problems with silver-less dye? (on analog tracks)

It seems that with the "more light/less light" system, (variable area) that it would work.

I am simply not a genious like the rest of you! I was taught to look at a scope and re-act!! (If in doubt of my results, to call Lonny!)

This poor man deserves some peace!

Granted, he always knows just what to say, but I'm a bit self concious.

It's kinda like pulling over and asking for directions while your girlfriend is watching!

*grin*

Russ


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Jacquart
Film Handler

Posts: 82
From: San Francisco, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 05-09-2000 10:18 PM      Profile for Ken Jacquart   Author's Homepage   Email Ken Jacquart   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Russ,

The Silver added to the analog soundtrack area greatly increases the contrast ratio between the black and clear. This is an optimum condition for the light spectrum output of lets say, a regular old exciter bulb. When the soundtracks are switched to cyan (greenish/blue...dark blue), that high contrast ratio will no longer exist if using an exicter bulb. In order to obtain a high contrast ratio to the cell with this cyan color, a red LED light source is required. The important difference here is the wavelength of light from the light source required for today's soundtracks vs the wavelength of light necessary for cyan soundtracks. Hope this helps somewhat...

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-10-2000 12:39 AM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ever take any photography classes in school? (or visit a friend's darkroom)

Go into the darkroom with the red safelight on. (Better darkrooms have "orange-ish sodium vapor lights, I believe.)

Look at something that's blue under the safelight. It'll look black. Same idea with the soundtrack! By making the "exciter" red and the soundtrack blue/purple the "solar cell" will see black.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-10-2000 07:29 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Understanding why silver is needed in the analog soundtrack when using "white light" (tungsten exciter lamp) readers requires a little history:

Early analog soundheads used gas or vacuum phototubes, which usually had a "S-1" spectral response that peaked at a wavelength of 800 nanometres (infrared). Tungsten bulbs were used as the exciter lamp. Tungsten bulbs produce both visible and infrared light.

Almost all early soundfilms were black-and-white (silver image). Silver efficiently modulates both visible and infrared light (it has "density" to a broad spectrum of energy). So B&W prints worked fine with the tungsten exciter lamps and S-1 response phototubes.

Dyes are relatively "transparent" to infrared energy, so silver was needed to modulate the light in old soundheads. Technicolor dye transfer prints used a special Kodak B&W print film as the "receiver" for its color dyes, so the Technicolor soundtrack was actually a B&W silver image.

When Eastman Color Print film was introduced in 1950, almost all soundheads still used tungsten exciter lamps and S-1 response phototubes. So special steps in the process sequence were developed, requiring TWO fixing baths, and a special viscous soundtrack redeveloper applied to only the soundtrack area to "redevelop" the silver after the process bleach step. The final print soundtrack contained cyan dye, magenta dye and silver, and worked well with tungsten exciter lamps and S-1 phototubes. But the special process steps required to get silver in the soundtrack added to the processing complexity and cost, and were a significant source of laboratory waste and water usage.

The advent of solid state "solar cells" did not significantly change the situation. The silicon cells usually had significant response in the infrared, and lower efficiency in the visible portion of the spectrum. When used with a tungsten exciter lamp, most of the sensitivity was still in the infrared, so silver was still needed. Trying to create a visible-only response with a red filter or cell sensitive to only visible light was not practical, as the efficiencies were poor, and signal levels were much lower.

The invention of high brightness visible red LED light sources for sound readers finally allows the use of cyan dye-only soundtracks, since they have little infrared energy and do not require silver in the soundtrack for efficient modulation. Solid-state red LED readers have significant advantages for theatres, and all new soundheads use red LEDs rather than tungsten exciter lamps.

Eliminating silver from the soundtrack will significantly reduce processing cost and waste, improve print quality, and help the environment (eliminates caustic chemicals, significantly reduces water use in processing, and eliminates silver in discarded prints).

Dye-only (cyan) analog soundtracks REQUIRE the use of red LED sound readers. A dye-only track played with a tungsten exciter lamp will have very low signal levels and very poor signal-to-noise. Dye-only tracks will be implemented when a large majority of theatres are equipped with red LED readers. Implementation is scheduled to begin in the United States in January 2001.

Many prints in release now have "high magenta" analog soundtracks. These tracks have magenta dye + silver, and are more compatible with both tungsten and red LED readers than the previous magenta + cyan + silver tracks. "High Magenta" tracks work well on all readers, but still have silver and the problems associated with it.

The cyan dye tracks being implemented next January will NOT have silver, and will only work well with red LED analog sound readers.

Kodak's website has complete information about dye soundtracks:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/dyetrack.shtml

None of the three current digital sound systems require silver in the soundtrack area, as they were designed to work well with dye only. So no changes are needed for digital sound readers.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com


 |  IP: Logged

Bill Purdy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 139
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 05-10-2000 09:32 AM      Profile for Bill Purdy   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Purdy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As you have already learned, you will not have any trouble with your visible light SRD reader. SRD tracks have always been dye only. If it is one of ours, in front of the EPT lamp you will see what looks like a small piece of glass (1" square), but in reality is a dichroic filter which prevents any of the infrared light from reaching the scanned area.

Kodak's information on this is worth reading, but if you want a simpler description complete with some helpful graphs, go to: http://www.componentengineering.com/webdocs/whydyetracks.pdf


 |  IP: Logged

Daryl Lund
Film Handler

Posts: 88
From: Chehalis,WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 05-10-2000 09:49 AM      Profile for Daryl Lund   Email Daryl Lund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Iam going to put in componant engineerings products. But Don Olsen has to stop by and say Hi.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.