Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Simplex E7 question

   
Author Topic: Simplex E7 question
Pete Lawrence
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 192
From: Middleburg, PA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 03-03-2000 08:27 PM      Profile for Pete Lawrence   Email Pete Lawrence   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a question about ancient history someone here may be able to answer. The Simplex E7 manual (available on this site)shows two shutters, one between the lamp and the film as usual and a second mounted out in front of the lens. Both rotate in the same direction on opposite ends of the same shaft. Any E7's I've seen in the past (including the ones I have) had the front shutter assembly removed. The only hint it was ever there is the extra long shaft sticking out the front. What was Simplex trying to do with this configuration?
Here's my guess as to what they intended, let's see anyone has a better answer. The two shutters, in effect, work the same as two counter-rotating shutters next to each other or a barrel shutter. Fewer degrees of rotation are required to blank the light and as a result longer light-on time. Something important back when drive-ins needed to squeeze all the light they could out of their arc lamps. Anyone got a better idea?

Thanks,
Pete

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-03-2000 08:48 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You are basically correct
they had to be removed to accomodate most cinemascope adapters
Because the second shutter is in front of the lens it does the same effect as counter rotating shutters in the brenkert and century
because the light beam has been inverted
It is also usuable in a narrow range of focal length of lens as the angular cutoff vs RPM is dependent on the angle of the cone of light

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-05-2000 11:23 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brenkert did the same thing with their BX62 which was a BX60 with front and rear shutters.

------------------

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.