Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Measuring Lab Quality (for release prints)

   
Author Topic: Measuring Lab Quality (for release prints)
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-04-1999 01:11 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This question is mostly for John Pytlak, but anyone with experince can chime in....

First, are any 'release-print' labs ISO9000 approved? (For anyone who might not know, ISO9000 is a quality control process.)

Second, (It's kind of hard to describe what I'm looking for here, but) I guess I'm looking for a 'number.' Let's say that I feel that a print is not quite right. Maybe it's too jumpy, weave-y, colors not quite right, etc. Not obviously bad, just a tiny bit beyond what I think is acceptable. Equal to, or below this 'number,' and I have the right to ask for a replacement print. And I'm thinking of a number that most labs would go by, not what SMPTE has in their standards.

I mean, if you call and ask for a replacement print saying it has too much jitter, the lab is probably just going to say, "It's your projector." (In fairness, if they gave one to eveybody who asked, they would need to print twice as many!) Example: If I pre-measure the jitter on my projectors with the magenta RP40, then compaire that with a release print, is that a valid test?

I'm looking for a quantitative way to reject a print, that can be done at the theaters.

While jitter and weave is fairly easy, I have no idea how to test for color quality in theaters. I've seen a 3-color temperture meter (a Tektronix,) and it was about the most exotic peice of equipment I ever saw- not for the everyday user.

Anyway, I know there are no easy answers to this, but what can a theater do to convince the lab to send a new reel(s) without sounding like 'the boy who cried wolf'?

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 02-09-2000 10:29 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
(whistle, whistle) I am (metaphorically speaking) pushing this old posting to the top of JP's "IN" basket....

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 02-10-2000 09:36 AM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is a good thread idea. Another related question: When the SMPTE makes up reference standard prints, where do they get them done? I have an old one that was done by General Film Labs--DeLuxe? It is rock steady too.

Do they go through a slower printing process, or a different printer type? Just wondering....

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Purdy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 139
From: Seattle, WA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 02-10-2000 10:29 AM      Profile for Bill Purdy   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Purdy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The last I heard, RP-40 was being printed one frame at a time from a glass plate negative. This is part of why it costs so much. Also, in this regard and in others having to do with registration (read "steadiness") it is important to remember that in almost all cases it is only in the projector that the film is guided by its edges. From camera to printer the perforations are the positioning elements, and in most cases, one specific perforation for each frame (but I can't remember which one).

------------------
Bill Purdy
Comonent Engineering

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 02-10-2000 10:43 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There's a guy near me (here in Connecticut) who does the test films for SMPTE. I talked to him a breifly few years ago. He said that it was getting harder to find the raw film stock good enough for test purposes. I forget what the problem was exactly, but I guess it was the perf's and slitting- not the emulsion.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-11-2000 12:32 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Information about ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 is available at:
http://www.iso.ch/9000e/9k14ke.html

Many Kodak manufacturing facilities have already been ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 certified. Likewise, film laboratories may have applied for certification, or already be certified --- you will have to ask the particular laboratory about the status of their certification.

To supplement ISO certification, and particular to the motion-picture industry, Kodak has developed a quality assurance program known as Imagecare (TM). Similar to ISO 9000, the Kodak Imagecare Program requires laboratories to standardize and document their procedures, monitor and control their processes, and be able to demonstrate that they are following the procedures and checklists they have documented. The Imagecare Program is being rolled out in selected regions worldwide. Information about the Kodak Imagecare Program is at:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/imagecare/index.shtml

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-11-2000 12:36 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Darn URL's :O The correct URL for ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 is:
http://www.iso.ch/9000e/9k14ke.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-11-2000 12:52 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John:

Stan D. in Ridgefield CT prints many of SMPTE's test films. Kodak supplies the film as "Special Order", which must be specially perforated to much tighter tolerances than normal SMPTE standards. So sometimes it takes extra time and effort to meet Stan's requirements.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Professional Motion Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.