Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » The Eight Channel Difference

   
Author Topic: The Eight Channel Difference
Jeremy Spracklen
Film Handler

Posts: 39
From: Arlington, TX, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-12-1999 02:22 AM      Profile for Jeremy Spracklen   Email Jeremy Spracklen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have read many times on this forum people bash the SDDS format. Well, I can not tell you how many times it has gotten me out of a jam. I work for a small chain that recently took over a theater from a larger one. In our large auditorium, they had the full 8 channel system installed and did it make a difference.-- Allow me to explain. The first thing we did was get rid of the SDDS and replaced it with a system that actually worked, a DTS-6D. And this is where the diffence could be noticed. In the first six months of operation we blew the left and right chanel woofers. We were easily able to move the two woofers that had never been used in the Left Center and Right Center and it did not cost us a penny! I highly recomend the eight channel SDDS because you never know when you will need spare amps or speakers after upgrading to a good system.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-12-1999 02:28 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cool! At least your company knows the difference between good systems and bad ones. But what happens when the next two channels get blown? Maybe DTS is far too powerful for an SDDS house!

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 10-12-1999 11:12 AM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SDDS is a reliable system. I'm not a big fan of it because it's just too expensive, but that doesn't mean it's unreliable.

There are problems; then there are Problems. Any tech worth his salt will chase down and fix problems. If it's a real Problem, then he will work with the company (say, Sony) learn little details that make him a more knowedgeable tech.

I think a lot of problems are caused by the people that use the equipment in question. Example: I cursed a Cinemecannica lens turret for a year, for not holding the lenses in focus and not staying aligned. But then I saw an operator slam them closed like a car door. I said, what are you doing!? He said he always closed it like that.

I'm not saying never, but 99 times out of 100, it's not the equipment.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Paymer
Film Handler

Posts: 31

Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-17-1999 03:49 AM      Profile for Brian Paymer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I must disagree with you Mr. Walsh. SDDS is far from reliable. You claim the techs do not know how to properly service them. Then why is it no tech I have found can fix them? There is something wrong with the design. I am tired of having the main track drop out to silence or the failsafe track which is really bad when I would rather it just fallback to optical when it faults. If the system is so good then why will it work for weeks at a time and crash on a Saturday evening performance only to work fine after rebooting the machine? These problems are not threading errors. The system is lousy and I refuse to thread the readers when I fill in at theater that has them. Judging from the cleanliness of the readers and the dirty projector heads I would assume the regular projectionists do not either. SR with a reverse scan always sounds better anyway. You must be a tech yourself and not have to operate to see how bad these machines are. Otherwise you would have sympathy when you get yelled at because the customers are complaining about the sound. The techs always love them and the projectionists always hate them. If you are a projectionist then you are the first one I know of who will back SDDS.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-18-1999 06:35 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the new AMC 24 in Kanata even Sony's own employees had problems when they installed the new firmware in them. I personally have no use for SDDS as it has no consistent reliability

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.