Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: New Line reels

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » New Line reels

Author

Topic: New Line reels

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 06-10-1999 04:50 PM

What is the general consensus on the new New Line reels that have just begun to circulate with prints of Austin Powers?

I like the fact they have a latch on each side to easily pull them apart, yet they won't "fall apart" like the Technicolor reels. Also nice is the way they fit easily onto the shaft and don't wobble like the standard ETS reels.

However, there is no drive pin hole! Most platter breakdown tables require this?

Any other pros and cons from operators? I am going to send in a letter to the manufacturer concerning this. The last time I did, Warner started putting the drive pin holes in their new reels.

Post your suggestions or opinions here before I send it please.

| IP: Logged

Erika Hellgren
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 168
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Jun 99

posted 06-10-1999 05:30 PM

Yes, I like the fact that the new reels don't fall apart, but other than that I'm not crazy about them. I'm definitely not crazy about the fact that I'll have to tear down AP onto 7000's before spinning it down onto the new reels. I work at a 16 plex, so I don't have a whole lot of time to deal with that kind of BS. So, my overall opinion is that they need to add that all-important hole before releasing any more prints on these things. Oh! And since they are so new, I find little pieces of plastic sticking out all over the place (from when they came out of the mold, I guess). Not too good when they rub against the film as it's coming off the reel

------------------

| IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 06-10-1999 11:21 PM

Why don't they just use a standard GOLDBERG floating hub METAL reel? I guess that would be too easy and the manufacturers wouldn't be able to sell you all kinds of adapters or new spindle/shafts to fit your makeup tables or rewind benches. Personally I'd like to shove those plastic reels up the ass of whoever designed them!

| IP: Logged

Aaron Mehocic
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 804
From: New Castle, PA, USA
Registered: Jun 99

posted 06-11-1999 03:16 PM

Ken, I can't agree more to your comments. I prefer the old metal reels myself, and like Erika, I to don't have much time to screw around in our nine plex either. As to the new New Line reels, well I thought they were rather pretty. I got to hand it to the designer that it was a good attempt to capture the look of antique reels that I have seen from the 1920's and 30's. However, here is where my respect for them stops. The absence of a drive pin hole made my build-up time about one half hour longer than usual. Coupled with other build-ups, that meant more time on an already maxed payroll and a complaining owner. I also noticed chards of plastic that occasionally scraped against the film. Moreover, the center holes were just to small to allow a Potts spindle to pass. When I did manage to get the reels mounted and tried to take them off the spindle, it was stuck. I had to get a flat screw driver and pry it off ever so carefully (I think Potts spindles are milled slightly larger than those from other companies. I have a hell of a time building-up film from blue Warner Brothers reels). Taken together I will tell you what I told the Assistant Manager last night: "The prettier they are, the more impractical they are". Give me a metal reel any day!

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 06-11-1999 03:22 PM

I'd take a 40 grit piece of metal emory cloth and sand that spindle down! That would drive me crazy. Use a Warner reel as a test.

| IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99

posted 06-11-1999 07:14 PM

On a limited basis we use to send film out on the Goldberg floating hub reel. We used 7000' or 36 inch reels. In the two years we did that, we only had one come back bent. I think that many more would be bent in real film shipping. I guess you would have to design a plastic reel carryer that would prevent bending. We sent out an average of 4 prints per week to four different executive's home screening rooms. We did this for at least 4 years. The guy who delivered them (in a limo) didn't take extrordinary care with them. We did have custom padded nylon bags made for the reels after one executive dropped one in the mud. The studio and the company eventualy stopped allowing them to take home prints.

There are no more executive screening rooms in the area that I know of. I'll bet the projectionists involved don't miss building up 4 or 8 prints on Friday afternoon and tearing down 4 to 8 prints on Monday morning. There was no additional compensation for this extra work. It just became "expected".

Uh oh! I've flown off on a tangent again. I'd better quit.

| IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99

posted 06-12-1999 04:05 AM

Those were the days, weren't they? Building up 4 prints a week and watching them at the theatre on the sly (or at a screening room). How many months in advance did we see most movies?

I do not miss those days at all. I am so content at my current theatre and company that I could never go back. But I do value the experience I gained at that other place ^__^

As for the new reels, why don't they just ship film like they used to? I don't like plastic reels at all. Especially when they are colored like a child's toy. I want to go back to the old days of bent up metal reels that slice up your hand every time you pick one up!

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 06-12-1999 02:25 PM

I'm still for shipping prints in boxes on cores straight from the lab! Always have been. There's just no reason to get those lab new prints into all that depot dust before anyone even runs them through a projector once.

Besides, then certain theaters could buy new reels before they even got loaded onto the platter, instead of after the first run.

| IP: Logged

Jeremy Spracklen
Film Handler

Posts: 39
From: Arlington, TX, USA
Registered: Jun 99

posted 06-13-1999 02:44 AM

Prior to recieving Austin Powers at my theater I had seen the new reels and was prepared for there not to be a hole for the spindle. I had heard that they were sturdy and would not come apart like the technicolor reels that we know and love. But sure enough the first reel I pulled out of the can fell apart. I had to transfer the core and film to a cheep technicolor reel to be able to finish building. I have a propisition - For the person who designed these new, and improved reels to come to my theater and break down the two prints that I have. Then I can see the funny look on his face when he tries to put the reel on the build up table. What an ass.

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 07-14-1999 10:59 PM

Well, for those who are going to be breaking down Austin Powers 2 in the near future and don't want to break it down to house reels and then rewind, I have found (at least on the Christie AW3 platter) that if the shaft set screw is loosened and the whole shaft is brought outward 1/2 inch and then retightened, the drive pin can be moved to the 4th hole (normally the 3rd hole is used) and you will be able to break down onto the "new" New Line reels with ease.

How's that for a one sentence post?

| IP: Logged

Joop de Gruiter
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: Lund, Sweden
Registered: Jul 99

posted 07-15-1999 12:20 AM

I don't understand why you use reels in the US. Here in Sweden all films come on cores.

| IP: Logged

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 07-15-1999 09:43 AM

Thanks for the tip. I imagine that this will be happening soon.

Also, If you take a cloth or something and make it really thick, you can make your own tension device for the Christie Build up table. Nice for building up to the platter with a 6K reel. Keeps nice tension so that the film doesn't flutter and get platter scratches.

| IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99

posted 07-15-1999 03:27 PM

Sounds like a good idea, Paul. Could you explain it further? I usually don't ever turn my tables past 3 0'clock to avoid the bouncing that it causes. Christie platters load sooooo sloooooooooooooooooooow.

| IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99

posted 07-16-1999 01:25 AM

I knew one guy who got a big weight and attached it to the motor on the makeup table just for this purpose. It worked very well, but I'll bet he had to change out the belt much more frequently.

I don't turn mine over 3:00 either.

| IP: Logged

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99

posted 07-16-1999 10:59 AM

Take somekind of thick cloths and fold it over a few times. Attach it to the build up table at the upper left corner. It doesn't really matter where, just so long as when the reel (2k or 6k) are on that it rubs against the cloth. If it is thick enough, you should be able to run pretty well, unattended, and not have the film flopping onto the platter.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.